Re: [naviserver-devel] Mercurial: naviserver.sourceforge.net/hg/

2008-06-02 Thread Stephen Deasey
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I decided to try, followed all the instructions. > First impression is very positive, it was easy. I commited my latest > changes into hg, so now both repos are in sync. > I will try to maintain both for a while and see how

Re: [naviserver-devel] Mercurial: naviserver.sourceforge.net/hg/

2008-06-01 Thread Vlad Seryakov
I decided to try, followed all the instructions. First impression is very positive, it was easy. I commited my latest changes into hg, so now both repos are in sync. I will try to maintain both for a while and see how it goes and will import all the modules one by one. Stephen Deasey wrote: > I

Re: [naviserver-devel] Mercurial: naviserver.sourceforge.net/hg/

2008-05-23 Thread Stephen Deasey
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another question: why to keep every module in separate repo? > will it be easier to have them under one root? No, they need to be separate repos. The reason is that unlike cvs hg is changeset based. There is one commit m

Re: [naviserver-devel] Mercurial: naviserver.sourceforge.net/hg/

2008-05-23 Thread Vlad Seryakov
Another question: why to keep every module in separate repo? will it be easier to have them under one root? Stephen Deasey wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I am personally ready to switch right away, i use hg for xine-lib for a >> long time alre

Re: [naviserver-devel] Mercurial: naviserver.sourceforge.net/hg/

2008-05-23 Thread Stephen Deasey
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am personally ready to switch right away, i use hg for xine-lib for a > long time already, in readonly mode but it did not require much learning > to use it. > > More questions, is hg repo hosted by SF? Is it Sf service o

Re: [naviserver-devel] Mercurial: naviserver.sourceforge.net/hg/

2008-05-23 Thread Vlad Seryakov
I am personally ready to switch right away, i use hg for xine-lib for a long time already, in readonly mode but it did not require much learning to use it. More questions, is hg repo hosted by SF? Is it Sf service or you just run additional hg server there? Stephen Deasey wrote: > On Fri, May

Re: [naviserver-devel] Mercurial: naviserver.sourceforge.net/hg/

2008-05-23 Thread Stephen Deasey
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does that mean i have to use either one, CVS or HG, not both at the same > time? > What i am asking, we still have 2 repos, will it work if commits are > coming to both of them? No, we should use one or the other. Or, we

Re: [naviserver-devel] Mercurial: naviserver.sourceforge.net/hg/

2008-05-23 Thread Vlad Seryakov
Does that mean i have to use either one, CVS or HG, not both at the same time? What i am asking, we still have 2 repos, will it work if commits are coming to both of them? Stephen Deasey wrote: > I updated the naviserver mercurial repo with the latest changes from > cvs put it on sourceforge: >