Am 06.08.2007 um 14:10 schrieb Gustaf Neumann:
> however, concerning getting openacs to work on naviserver,
> i would prefer having support for some time the good old blueprint
> way.
I understand. So the idea is to:
a. keep the introspective loader
b. design some "package loader" for A
Am 06.08.2007 um 19:24 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
> IIRC namespaced variables aren't touched because it would be too
> expensive.
>
> Do they get cloned at startup though? This test:
>
> test init-1.4 {namespace variables do not get cloned} -body {
> ns_job wait $qid [ns_job queue $qid { info
Am 06.08.2007 um 19:24 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
> On 8/6/07, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> As of today, what we have is:
>>
>> a.
>> introspective script based on the "old" way as 4.0 AS
>> did it (init the interp by loading all Tcl files then
>> run a script to pul
On 8/6/07, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As of today, what we have is:
>
> a.
> introspective script based on the "old" way as 4.0 AS
> did it (init the interp by loading all Tcl files then
> run a script to pull-out namespaces, variables etc
"variables etc." -- do w
Am 06.08.2007 um 18:54 schrieb Zoran Vasiljevic:
>
> I modified the "old way" NOT to use introspective
> script, rather to use Tcl command traces :-)
OK, not really *everything*. Tcl namespace serialization
(variables/procedures) is still done "the old way".
The problem with that that a namespa
On 8/6/07, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> After spenging a weekend over this, I know less than
> before...
>
> The question is how we are going to improve the Tcl
> initialization so people could benefit from that better
> than now?
>
> As of today, what we have is:
>
> a.
>
Am 06.08.2007 um 18:47 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
> I would keep old initialization if i need speed, if performance is
> going
> to suffer with Tcl/ns_ictl approach, then for fast/busy sites we
> need to
> be able to use old(fast) way. Otherwise, the server will be limited
> for
> non-realtime
I would keep old initialization if i need speed, if performance is going
to suffer with Tcl/ns_ictl approach, then for fast/busy sites we need to
be able to use old(fast) way. Otherwise, the server will be limited for
non-realtime or personal web sites usage only.
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
> Hi!
Zoran Vasiljevic schrieb:
> I think that old AS approach is the worst as it is really limited.
>
true. and not scalable
> The Tcl-trace based approach is better but is known to have some
> problems (I do not know which ones), yet, it is pretty powerful
> and has some other nice side-effects (les
Hi Zoran,
I've spend the weekend compiling and re-compiling the kernel and
different versions of gcc/glib on two machines (with different
CFLAGS/CHOST settings).
NS "make test" worked only once on one of the two machines (with CHOST
set to "i386-pc-linux-gnu" - GCC 4.2 no longer supports that). T
Hi Zoran,
I've spend the weekend compiling and re-compiling the kernel and
different versions of gcc/glib on two machines (with different
CFLAGS/CHOST settings).
NS "make test" worked only once on one of the two machines (with CHOST
set to "i386-pc-linux-gnu" - GCC 4.2 no longer supports that). T
11 matches
Mail list logo
