On 10.10.2012, at 19:22, Jeff Rogers wrote:
> This is pretty standard and sensible for a project supported by volunteers.
>
> However, what I'd like to see - when reasonable - is an option for
> backwards compatibility, either by setting a config flag or loading a
> compatibility module, as nss
Gustaf Neumann wrote:
> Forward-looking does certainly not mean that we do not want
> to keep compatibility (we have all large code bases using
> naviserver) but i would certainly hate to see e.g. the
> useless $conn argument to be re-introduced in naviserver
> just because some 10+ year old code
