On 11.12.2006, at 06:17, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
The results are somewhat bad, Naviserver is 2x slower on simple adp
page
comparing to similar PHP page.
Not that the channel stuff I added some time is braking us...
Did you try the aolserver, as it does not use Tcl channels
at the places we do?
It is all defaults, as php and NS. I even tried to test test.html, but
still apache is almost twice fatster than fastpath.
Changing to clock did not make any difference. Playing with fancy
non-fancy ADP parsers did not change anything as well. Looks like
deficiency in Tcl and driver/queue proc
On 11.12.2006, at 16:13, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
Looks like
deficiency in Tcl and driver/queue processing.
If you use static pages, then Tcl whould be included
only when accessing Tcl FS. That's why I asked if
you can try aolserver under same circumstances,
as it does not call Tcl FS for that ki
I tested AS 4.5, it is even slower than NS, not much but a little bit
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 11.12.2006, at 06:17, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
The results are somewhat bad, Naviserver is 2x slower on simple adp
page
comparing to similar PHP page.
Not that the channel stuff I added some time i
On 11.12.2006, at 16:27, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
I tested AS 4.5, it is even slower than NS, not much but a little bit
Well, then it is not the Tcl channel stuff as 4.5 still uses
open/read. In that case it must be something else. I guess you
need to put shortcircuit code at various places to is
I can sqeeze something from C maybe, but Tcl is a bottleneck, making
"for" loop bigger than over 200-500 iterations makes it crawl comparing
to PHP, even with Tcl files cached, still it is 2-3 times slower. I am
evaluating stuff for high performance web site and it looks like Tcl
alone makes re
On 11.12.2006, at 16:56, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
I can sqeeze something from C maybe, but Tcl is a bottleneck
I understood that even for a index.html (which is a static file)
you get bad values. Therefore I suggested to short-circuit
layers and find out which one sucks.
Tcl is definitely not th
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 11.12.2006, at 16:56, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
I can sqeeze something from C maybe, but Tcl is a bottleneck
I understood that even for a index.html (which is a static file)
you get bad values. Therefore I suggested to short-circuit
layers and find out which one sucks.
On 11.12.2006, at 17:04, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
It is hard to convince to use 2-3 times slower
language even if the whole system is more versatile
I think you need to make some "realistic" examples
and then compare. But this is out of the scope of
this discussion.
We need/should know where we
On 12/11/06, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can sqeeze something from C maybe, but Tcl is a bottleneck, making
"for" loop bigger than over 200-500 iterations makes it crawl comparing
to PHP, even with Tcl files cached, still it is 2-3 times slower. I am
evaluating stuff for high perfo
No i am not moving to PHP, i am just trying to to justify the reason for
some people why i am still using Naviserver/Tcl and do not want to
switch to more "modern" or popular platforms like PHP, Java, Python or
Ruby. If nothing else, the problem only arise when comparing speed, not
overall syst
On 11.12.2006, at 23:21, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
Getting to C language every time i need to do stuff is not an option
Did yu try ns_return as Stephen suggested?
yes, it is slower than from .adp page
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 11.12.2006, at 23:21, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
Getting to C language every time i need to do stuff is not an option
Did yu try ns_return as Stephen suggested?
--
Actually i was wrong, when using .tcl file and caching enabled it works
faster than apache/php, not significantly but only when acceptsize is
greater than 1, i tested with 5, results are exactly as php, around
1540-1560 req/sec, when i set acceptsize to 10, i constantly got results
1600-1610.
>Then i disabled .tcl caching, results are constantly around 1500 req/sec
>and i checked PHP source, it does compile file with every request, so
>PHP compiler is little bit faster than Tcl compiler.
when you install the Zend Optimizer (with default optimization levels), how
much does that speed
15 matches
Mail list logo
