On 24.10.2007, at 00:34, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
> Yes, i already tested it and just commited, please review if anybody
> have time. I am sure it does not break anything and if maxupload
> parameters is not set will never be activated but it is pretty useful.
> Now it is possible to upload/download
On 23.10.2007, at 23:52, Vasiljevic Zoran wrote:
> Now that we "solved" that one
So, it is done. I will shortly check-in the changes.
But before I do, a question: how "seriously" should
I take those tests:
test cfg-4.3 {type check: bool != int} -body {
ns_getconfig -bool section cfg-4.
On 10/24/07, Vasiljevic Zoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 23.10.2007, at 23:52, Vasiljevic Zoran wrote:
>
> > Now that we "solved" that one
>
> So, it is done. I will shortly check-in the changes.
> But before I do, a question: how "seriously" should
> I take those tests:
>
> test cfg-4.3
ns_conn contentfile will be non empty only in such situation, in normal
cases it is always empty
Vasiljevic Zoran wrote:
> On 24.10.2007, at 00:34, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
>
>> Yes, i already tested it and just commited, please review if anybody
>> have time. I am sure it does not break anything an
On 24.10.2007, at 18:13, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
> ns_conn contentfile will be non empty only in such situation, in
> normal
> cases it is always empty
>
So the non-empty [ns_conn contentfile] means we need to parse.
Otherwise server parses.
Allright. I will take the freedom to make the changes
On 24.10.2007, at 18:36, Stephen Deasey wrote:
> A buffer size of 'no' doesn't make any
> sense.
But
ns_getconfig section buffer no (module A)
ns_getconfig section buffer 1000 (module B)
is the application problem, not ours.
This is simply clash of config params. I do not
think we nee
On 24.10.2007, at 18:36, Stephen Deasey wrote:
> ns_getconfig both uses and declares. It declares so that an admin can
> set the correct value. Some code may only need to check whether a
> buffer size is greater than zero (is it true?), but that doesn't make
> it a boolean config option. A buffer
On 24.10.2007, at 19:09, Vasiljevic Zoran wrote:
> So
>
>ns_getconfig -bool section param 1
>ns_getconfig -int section param
>configuration parameter is not an integer
>
> would make you happy?
>
Lets stop and think about consequences of this...
Underneath, some integer will be used
Actually i put this for windows as well, only mmap now does not compile
for window, but i never tested, does not have windows
Vasiljevic Zoran wrote:
> On 24.10.2007, at 18:13, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
>
>> ns_conn contentfile will be non empty only in such situation, in
>> normal
>> cases it is a
On 24.10.2007, at 19:58, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
> Actually i put this for windows as well, only mmap now does not
> compile
> for window, but i never tested, does not have windows
I have written NsMemMap and NsMemUmap (nsd/nswin.c).
This should work.
--
On 10/24/07, Vasiljevic Zoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 24.10.2007, at 19:09, Vasiljevic Zoran wrote:
>
> > So
> >
> >ns_getconfig -bool section param 1
> >ns_getconfig -int section param
> >configuration parameter is not an integer
> >
> > would make you happy?
> >
>
> Lets sto
On 24.10.2007, at 20:35, Stephen Deasey wrote:
> On 10/24/07, Vasiljevic Zoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On 24.10.2007, at 19:09, Vasiljevic Zoran wrote:
>>
>>> So
>>>
>>>ns_getconfig -bool section param 1
>>>ns_getconfig -int section param
>>>configuration parameter is not an
On 10/24/07, Vasiljevic Zoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK. I buy everything.
>
> So, supported conversion rules:
>
> Unknown -> any
> Int -> Unknown
> Bool-> Unknown
Unknown -> Int || Bool
Valid for the value stored in the config itself.
On the way out:
Int || Bool ->
On 24.10.2007, at 21:31, Stephen Deasey wrote:
> Yes.
It is (now in CVS). We now only have knownBugs
left, but we will never bee case-insensitive
I guess.
Now: where you want to go today?
Couple of issues still left:
persistence
wideint type
parameter introspection
(you name it)
Chee
On 10/23/07, Vasiljevic Zoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What we haven't figured out is: how the changed
> params are saved (made persistent) when a change
> occurs? This is by no means trivial to do.
> Perhaps the easiest would be to have some kind of
> dbm-like storage (qdbm is nice and LGPL)
On 10/24/07, Vasiljevic Zoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 24.10.2007, at 21:31, Stephen Deasey wrote:
>
> > Yes.
>
> It is (now in CVS).
Does the same apply to min and max?
It seems like it logically should.
-
This SF
16 matches
Mail list logo
