Re: [Nbd] [PATCH] nbd: use loff_t for blocksize and nbd_set_size args

2016-12-02 Thread Jens Axboe
On 12/02/2016 02:19 PM, Josef Bacik wrote: > If we have large devices (say like the 40t drive I was trying to test with) we > will end up overflowing the int arguments to nbd_set_size and not get the > right > size for our device. Fix this by using loff_t everywhere so I don't have to > think

[Nbd] [PATCH] nbd: use loff_t for blocksize and nbd_set_size args

2016-12-02 Thread Josef Bacik
If we have large devices (say like the 40t drive I was trying to test with) we will end up overflowing the int arguments to nbd_set_size and not get the right size for our device. Fix this by using loff_t everywhere so I don't have to think about this again. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik