Markus,
sorry for delay, I didn't have email access two days,
On 10/26, Markus Pargmann wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 03:27:13PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > It is not safe to use the task_struct returned by kthread_run(threadfn)
> > if threadfn() can exit before the "owner" does
On 10/26, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 03:27:13PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > It is not safe to use the task_struct returned by kthread_run(threadfn)
> > if threadfn() can exit before the "owner" does kthread_stop(), nothing
> > protects this task_struct.
> >
> > So
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 05:26:42PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 03:27:13PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > It is not safe to use the task_struct returned by kthread_run(threadfn)
> > if threadfn() can exit before the "owner" does kthread_stop(), nothing
> >
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 03:27:13PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> It is not safe to use the task_struct returned by kthread_run(threadfn)
> if threadfn() can exit before the "owner" does kthread_stop(), nothing
> protects this task_struct.
>
> So __nbd_ioctl() looks buggy; a killed
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 03:27:13PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> It is not safe to use the task_struct returned by kthread_run(threadfn)
> if threadfn() can exit before the "owner" does kthread_stop(), nothing
> protects this task_struct.
>
> So __nbd_ioctl() looks buggy; a killed
