Hi
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 24 June 2016 13:09:36 Pranay Kr. Srivastava wrote:
>> When a timeout occurs or a recv fails, then
>> instead of abruplty killing nbd block device
>> wait for it's users to finish.
>>
>> This is more required when file
Hi,
On Friday 24 June 2016 13:09:36 Pranay Kr. Srivastava wrote:
> When a timeout occurs or a recv fails, then
> instead of abruplty killing nbd block device
> wait for it's users to finish.
>
> This is more required when filesystem(s) like
> ext2 or ext3 don't expect their buffer heads to
> disa
Hi
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Pranay Kr. Srivastava
wrote:
> When a timeout occurs or a recv fails, then
> instead of abruplty killing nbd block device
> wait for it's users to finish.
>
> This is more required when filesystem(s) like
> ext2 or ext3 don't expect their buffer heads to
> disa
Hi Eric,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 06/24/2016 04:09 AM, Pranay Kr. Srivastava wrote:
>> When a timeout occurs or a recv fails, then
>> instead of abruplty killing nbd block device
>
> s/abruplty/abruptly/
>
>> wait for it's users to finish.
>
> s/it's/its/
>
>>
>> Th
On 06/24/2016 04:09 AM, Pranay Kr. Srivastava wrote:
> When a timeout occurs or a recv fails, then
> instead of abruplty killing nbd block device
s/abruplty/abruptly/
> wait for it's users to finish.
s/it's/its/
>
> This is more required when filesystem(s) like
> ext2 or ext3 don't expect thei
When a timeout occurs or a recv fails, then
instead of abruplty killing nbd block device
wait for it's users to finish.
This is more required when filesystem(s) like
ext2 or ext3 don't expect their buffer heads to
disappear while the filesystem is mounted.
Each open of a nbd device is refcounted,
