Am 04.03.2016 um 09:49 hat Wouter Verhelst geschrieben:
> Hi folks,
>
> (sorry about the lateness of this reply, was busy for the last few weeks)
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:34:04AM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > On 02/18/2016 11:09 AM, Alex Bligh wrote:
> > > On 17 Feb 2016, at 18:10, Denis
Hi folks,
(sorry about the lateness of this reply, was busy for the last few weeks)
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:34:04AM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> On 02/18/2016 11:09 AM, Alex Bligh wrote:
> > On 17 Feb 2016, at 18:10, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> >
> >> Currently available NBD_CMD_TRIM command ca
On 02/18/2016 02:18 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:58:47PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 02/17/2016 11:10 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>>> @@ -446,6 +448,11 @@ The following request types exist:
>>> about the contents of the export affected by this command, until
>>> ov
On 02/18/2016 03:14 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:58:47PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 02/17/2016 11:10 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>>> This patch proposes a new command to reduce the amount of data passed
>>> through the wire when it is known that the data is all zeroe
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:58:47PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/17/2016 11:10 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > This patch proposes a new command to reduce the amount of data passed
> > through the wire when it is known that the data is all zeroes. This
> > functionality is generally useful for mir
On 02/18/2016 12:18 PM, Roman Kagan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:58:47PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 02/17/2016 11:10 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>>> @@ -446,6 +448,11 @@ The following request types exist:
>>> about the contents of the export affected by this command, until
>>>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:58:47PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/17/2016 11:10 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > @@ -446,6 +448,11 @@ The following request types exist:
> > about the contents of the export affected by this command, until
> > overwriting it again with `NBD_CMD_WRITE`.
> >
On 02/18/2016 11:09 AM, Alex Bligh wrote:
> On 17 Feb 2016, at 18:10, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>
>> Currently available NBD_CMD_TRIM command can not be used as the
>> specification explicitely says that "a client MUST NOT make any
>> assumptions about the contents of the export affected by this
>> [N
On 02/18/2016 07:46 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> On 02/17/2016 11:58 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 02/17/2016 11:10 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>>> This patch proposes a new command to reduce the amount of data passed
>>> through the wire when it is known that the data is all zeroes. This
>>> functional
On 17 Feb 2016, at 18:10, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> Currently available NBD_CMD_TRIM command can not be used as the
> specification explicitely says that "a client MUST NOT make any
> assumptions about the contents of the export affected by this
> [NBD_CMD_TRIM] command, until overwriting it again
On 02/17/2016 11:58 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/17/2016 11:10 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>> This patch proposes a new command to reduce the amount of data passed
>> through the wire when it is known that the data is all zeroes. This
>> functionality is generally useful for mirroring or backup oper
On 02/17/2016 11:10 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> This patch proposes a new command to reduce the amount of data passed
> through the wire when it is known that the data is all zeroes. This
> functionality is generally useful for mirroring or backup operations.
>
> Currently available NBD_CMD_TRIM c
12 matches
Mail list logo
