Hi,
I've now cloned the nebula git repo and added a geomap component with
projects for the geomap widget and viewer. I set the version numbers to
0.1.0.qualified. I've done some refactoring, like changing the names,
moving some classes to internal packages, etc. The main methods of the
Hi Hall,
Did you fork it on github? If not, then please do. Otherwise I cannot pull
from that repo.
So what you need to do is the following.
1. Get a github account
2. Fork the repository [1]
3. Add the components to that repository.
4. Let us know, so we can pull from that repo.
You can also
See comments below.
On 09.04.12 19.11, Wim Jongman wrote:
Hi Hall,
hal or Hallvard, please ;-)
Did you fork it on github? If not, then please do. Otherwise I cannot
pull from that repo.
Now I have: https://github.com/hallvard/nebula
Hallvard
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Hallvard
I am looking at it right now. Nice.
These are the CQ's
http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6396
http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6397
They should be ready in a couple of days.
Regards,
Wim
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Hallvard Trætteberg h...@idi.ntnu.no wrote:
Hi,
I don't favor any particular naming suggestions concerning packaging or
classnames. On iOS the Map-Component is called MapKit (not WorldMap* or the
like) so that one is taken.
Regards,
Stepan
Am 05.04.2012 um 15:31 schrieb Hallvard Trætteberg:
Hi,
We need to decide the naming of 1)
prepare our
respective parts.
- Hallvard
- Reply message -
From: Stepan Rutz stepan.r...@gmx.de
To: Nebula Dev nebula-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: [nebula-dev] Map Viewer - Getting ready
Date: Fri, Apr 6, 2012 08:35
Hi,
I don't favor any particular naming suggestions concerning packaging
stepan.r...@gmx.de
To: Nebula Dev nebula-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: [nebula-dev] Map Viewer - Getting ready
Date: Fri, Apr 6, 2012 08:35
Hi,
I don't favor any particular naming suggestions concerning packaging or
classnames. On iOS the Map-Component is called MapKit (not WorldMap
Hi,
We need to decide the naming of 1) the project component, 2) the widget
and 3) the viewer. IMO, the best would be to find a common name for 1)
and 2) and append Viewer to make 3), e.g. map, Map and MapViewer.
However, using just map for 1) and 2) may suggest the control is for Map
data,
Yes i see your point.
We have some naming conventions on the contribution wiki as far as the
namespace is concerned.
I like your MapControl suggestion. But anything you guys decide is fine with
me. Stepan, what do you think.
Regards,
Wim
On Apr 5, 2012, at 15:31, Hallvard Trætteberg
