Re: [nebula-dev] Another widget from Opal

Totally cool. Thanks Laurent. From: nebula-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:nebula-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Laurent Caron Sent: Tuesday, 13 February 2018 20:54 To: Nebula Dev Subject: [nebula-dev] Another widget from Opal Good Evening, I would like to inform you that I've migrated

Re: [nebula-dev] Opal Widgets: Documentation

PS Only initial edits by a user are moderated as spam control. ~~~ Jonah Graham Kichwa Coders Ltd. www.kichwacoders.com On 13 February 2018 at 20:22, Jonah Graham wrote: > Hi Laurent, > > You should find your edits to the Wiki all accepted now, and you > should no longer

Re: [nebula-dev] Opal Widgets: Documentation

Hi Laurent, You should find your edits to the Wiki all accepted now, and you should no longer be moderated. Jonah ~~~ Jonah Graham Kichwa Coders Ltd. www.kichwacoders.com On 13 February 2018 at 19:58, Laurent Caron wrote: > Good Evening, > > I've started to migrate

[nebula-dev] Opal Widgets: Documentation

Good Evening, I've started to migrate the Opal documentation from Github wiki to Eclipse Wiki. (and fixed the spelling misgtakes) I discovered that these pages should be validated by moderators. I'm just wondering who is in charge of this validation ? Cheers, Laurent

Re: [nebula-dev] Bugzilla component entries for Opal

Good Evening, That's ok for me, thank you ! Laurent 2018-02-13 19:57 GMT+01:00 Wim Jongman : > Hi, > > I have made Bugzilla entries for all the opal widgets. Let me know if I > missed one. > > Cheers, > > Wim > > [image: Inline image 1] > > > >

[nebula-dev] Bugzilla component entries for Opal

Hi, I have made Bugzilla entries for all the opal widgets. Let me know if I missed one. Cheers, Wim [image: Inline image 1] ___ nebula-dev mailing list nebula-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe

Re: [nebula-dev] Building Nebula

Thanks, Matthias and Wim, this works (after specifying -DskipTests=true, as I had test failures). On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 7:22 PM, Wim Jongman wrote: > Matthias is completely correct. > > We have two sets of widgets. One stable and maintained (release) and one >