yep, the two individual ones combined take about 12-13 secs . what does the
profiling tell you?
Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards
Ir. T. Zeppenfeldt
van der Waalsstraat 30
6706 JR Wageningen
The Netherlands
Mobile: +31 6 23 28 78 06
Phone: +31 3 17 84 22 17
E-mail:
hi i am sing neo4j 2.0.3.
It provides new awesome Merge clause. But i got duplicate node from this
:
First i create a UserNode :
MERGE (n:User {uniqueid : '1'})
ON CREATE SET
n.name = 'Test1'
ON MATCH SET
n.name = 'Test1'
then i want to add relation b/w UserNode and CurrentNode (
thanks Michael for reply.
Also did i need to run thes command once when db open or every time when i
run a query
create constraint on (u:User) assert u.uniqueid is unique;
create constraint on (c:Current) assert c.uniqueid is unique;
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Michael Hunger
I already asked this question on stackoverflow, but it seems to be very
opinionated. So it's better to ask here.
We're starting a new project and looking for an appropriate storage
solution for our case. Main requirements for the storage are as follows:
- Ability to support highly flexible
Only once, those constraints will be kept up to date transactionally.
Michael
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Navrattan Yadav
navrattan.craterz...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks Michael for reply.
Also did i need to run thes command once when db open or every time when
i run a query
create
yes its working fine now. thanks again.
also can you provide me some reference how to implement Dijkstra .
i want to find most common path used by people.
i have some fixed CheckPoints : each checkpoint is a unique node.
when user traverse a checkpoint : i create a relation b/w previous
Did you try to modify my query to work with your schema? With your added
description I think it will actually work.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Navrattan Yadav
navrattan.craterz...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for response.
DB Details Are :
A city has some fixed location(Called CheckPoint
yes query is what i am looking . But issue is each relationship has
different name : it created dynamically with time stamp.
so may be i need to change DB structure.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Wes Freeman freeman@gmail.com wrote:
Did you try to modify my query to work with your
You can just use * without specifying type. But yeah, timestamp in reltype
is going to cause issues shortly--the reltype limit is 64k at least as of
2.0. So, an alternative model with better reltypes is going to be necessary.
Wes
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Navrattan Yadav
