it is planned, yes
https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j/issues/2725
https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j/issues/2725
Am 04.06.2015 um 09:49 schrieb Tom Zeppenfeldt t.zeppenfe...@ophileon.com:
Michael,
Thanks. At least it's not something that I did wrong :) You say yet..
is it something that
Tom,
UNION does not support post-processing past the union yet. So with is only
applied to the first part and you would have to replicate that with.
Or you just send two statements.
HTH Michael
Am 01.06.2015 um 03:52 schrieb Tom Zeppenfeldt tomzeppenfe...@gmail.com:
For a faceted search
Michael,
Thanks. At least it's not something that I did wrong :) You say yet..
is it something that will be possible in future versions?
Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards
Ir. T. Zeppenfeldt
van der Waalsstraat 30
6706 JR Wageningen
The Netherlands
Mobile: +31 6 23 28 78 06
no one has a clue?
Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards
Tom Zeppenfeldt
---
Ir. T. Zeppenfeldt
van der Waalsstraat 30
6706 JR Wageningen
The Netherlands
Mobile: +31 6 23 28 78 06
E-mail: tomzeppenfe...@gmail.com
Twitter:
*For a faceted search I first do a MATCH on multiple conditions, and then
count the remaining facet values. *
match
(n:Document)-[:PUBLISHED_ON]-(d:Day)-[:HAS_DAY]-(m:Month)-[:HAS_MONTH]-(y:Year
{year:2013}),
(n)-[:MENTIONED_IN|HAS_CHILD*1..]-(l:Location {name:'Netherlands'} )