thanks a lot.
On Wednesday, March 23, 2016 at 8:53:31 AM UTC+1, Michael Hunger wrote:
>
> MATCH (p:Product)-[r:inside]->(c:Category)
>
> SET r.type = p.id + '->' + c.id
>
> But I *strongly recommend against* setting this kind of property !!
>
> As you can always compute the information!
>
>
No, there are no constraints on rels.
What's your use-case? Do you have an actual performance problem?
Michael
> Am 23.03.2016 um 09:49 schrieb kincheong lau :
>
> Thanks! I was thinking adding unique property and then create
> index/constraint might improve
Thanks! I was thinking adding unique property and then create
index/constraint might improve performance, would that be the case?
On Wednesday, March 23, 2016 at 3:53:31 PM UTC+8, Michael Hunger wrote:
>
> MATCH (p:Product)-[r:inside]->(c:Category)
>
> SET r.type = p.id + '->' + c.id
>
> But
> MATCH (p:Product)-[r:inside]->(c:Category)
SET r.type = p.id + '->' + c.id
But I strongly recommend against setting this kind of property !!
As you can always compute the information!
> MATCH (p:Product)-[r:inside]->(c:Category)
RETURN p.id + '->' + c.id
MERGE always tries to find the