Hello
I have a client server setup, both of which are dependent upon the same
domain objects. As things stand, the server depends on the client and
subclasses the domain objects in order to add in the neo4j annotations.
This enables me to exclude the neo4j dependencies from the client to
Actually, I was just curious and couldn't find documentation. I'd been
using spring-data-neo4j, and their old neo4jOperations interface used to be
able to fetch the Node objects. I found some old code that made use of
that facility, and wanted to find out if I needed to refactor, or if I just
I'm using neo4j 2.3.3 server. Is there anyway to get a Node object?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more
When I add data to the database, I use a merge something like this:
MERGE (n:Thing { uid : }) ON CREATE SET n.prop1 = blah1, n.prop2
= blah2 ...
Since I'm working in a multi-threaded environment, it's possible to have
the same node written twice and I've seen many instances where duplicate
This is version 2.3.3
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
I'm still seeing 10x performance hit from a uniqueness constraint being
added. Is this on the roadmap to be addressed?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
The latest version of OGM addresses neo4's flakiness by adding in "retry"
functionality for these specific exceptions. I haven't seen it since
upgrading.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
So before the constraint, I was still using merges because I really did
want something akin to uniqueness for these nodes. We had an index on the
"uid" so maybe that helped with the full scan?
Yes, I use parameters, not literal values.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
I'm using Neo4j 2.3.3 and spring-data-neo4j in a highly threaded
environment where I attempt lots of reads/writes, and I often get
NoHttpResponseException (which means neo didn't respond). This happens
most frequently on reads when I'm using a
Neo4jOperations object to load domain objects to
Was this problem ever resolved? I still see it consistently. I'm running
neo4j 2.3.3, ogm version 1.1.4, and using neo4j template from
spring-data-neo4j 4.0.0.RELEASE.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group
So apparently this is an OLD neo bug:
https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j/issues/37
https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j/issues/6823
and finally:
https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j/issues/7288
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from
I'm sorry, I'm not sure exactly what you mean by query scan. I haven't
changed any of the queries from before the addition of the uniqueness
constraint. I'm still doing the same "MERGE ..." query (like above, but
with parameters, as you pointed out). Do you mean that, or something else?
oxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:208)
at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy85.load(Unknown Source)
...
If I dig in with a debugger, it's actually just the same exception.
On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 at 5:06:52 PM UTC-7, Michael Hunger wrote:
>
> SDN 4.1.1 with OGM 2.0.2
>
> > Am 31.05.2016 um
Which of those dependencies should I upgrade? You mean neo4j?
Thanks!
Eric
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/37823552/neo4j-ogm-neo4jsession-variable-substitution-queries-fail
I posed the question on stack overflow, but I wanted to pose it here too.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this
You have to add the base package to the session during neo4j configuration.
Unbelievable that this isn't documented. I just wasted half of my day.
Good luck everyone else.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this
Is it safe to return a list instead of an Iterable in a Neo4j Spring Data
Repository?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
That's good to know. As I've said before, we are not executing in a
threaded environment.
Thanks,
Eric
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
I've attached an image of what i'm talking about.
I'm not sure how this can happen or how to undo it. Does anyone know?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
We are not doing any concurrent transaction, so that theory is out.
Appreciate the suggestion though.
Thanks,
Eric
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
>
> So in this case, the query is actually a MERGE.
>
MATCH (a:SecretObject {uid: {1}}),(b:SecretObject {uid: {2}}) "MERGE
(a)<-[r:`%s`]-(b)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
The merge is not done by hand so the rel name will be consistent every
time. I'm going to see if I can reproduce it.
A little more information:
Initially, that start node had two relationships
A-[produces]->B
A-[produces]->C
The problem showed up after detach-deleting C after which we
I've got this query:
@Query(MATCH (n:SomeObj)-[*1..1]->(b) where n.id = '1' RETURN *)
public SomeObj getSomeObjectByIdD1(String id);
It doesn't seem to be returning the relationships to depth one as I would
expect. Is this not possible?
--
You received this message because you are
>
>
>
> Am 22.03.2016 um 21:53 schrieb 'Eric Fulton' via Neo4j <
> ne...@googlegroups.com >:
>
> I've got this query:
>
> @Query(MATCH (n:SomeObj)-[*1..1]->(b) where n.id = '1' RETURN *)
> public SomeObj getSomeObjectByIdD1(String id);
>
>
&g
24 matches
Mail list logo
