Oh nice, I've been using the same chip but I wanted to double check if 
there wasn't some other solution people were using.

I went with the SiSB46DN suggested by the datasheet and I've been fine with 
protection even for 3.3V with a lower voltage bound of 3V.

I've also tested a circuit for 0.6-1.5V for filaments by powering the IC at 
a higher voltage but applying the lower V-filament to the transistor, and 
that also works.

On Monday, 8 November 2021 at 01:29:04 UTC-5 newxito wrote:

> This is the protection circuit I use, taken from the LTC4365 datasheet. I 
> used the formulas to calculate the resistors and the LTspice simulation 
> confirmed the values. The circuit works, kind of, shuts down under 4V and 
> over 6V. But when starting with 5V I only get around 4.2 output voltage, 
> that’s wrong. Probably some kind of oscillation…
> I use the same circuit with other resistor values for 12V and it works 
> perfectly all the time.
>
>
> ZY schrieb am Montag, 8. November 2021 um 01:59:34 UTC+1:
>
>> What is your method of input protection?
>>
>> On Sunday, 7 November 2021 at 17:14:52 UTC-5 newxito wrote:
>>
>>> Today I built the clock. There is an error on the board, the DataIn pin 
>>> of the LED array is connected to the wrong side of the level shifter, but 
>>> it seems to work fine with 3.3V. I also had problems with the input 
>>> protection (over, under and reverse voltage). I always used the circuit 
>>> with 12V but this boards uses 5V, probably the monitoring window is too 
>>> small. Anyway, removing some components and a big blob of solder, solved 
>>> the problem :-)  
>>> I fill fix the design errors on Rev2… time to start making the case…
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/b36b7ec2-d257-473d-8d80-2fce724f4769n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to