I'm very impressed with the realtime rendering. The cathodes are "stacked"
like a real nixie, and at an angle, they disappear behind adjacent nixies.
Reflective flat surfaces (anodes) are accurately modeled; even tube pins
will disappear, then reappear as the clock is rotated. I'm not 100% sure
Anyone have a stash of these they're looking to off-load?
PM if you wish.
Thanks,
Nick
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Thanks for setting my post properly up. Using Chromium now for better
compatibility.
M1 schrieb am Mittwoch, 3. August 2022 um 00:31:24 UTC+3:
> Pretty kewl.
>
>
>
> Ummm, all the mouse movements are reversed for me. Even the zoom in/out.
>
>
>
> Michail
>
>
>
> *From:*
Poor little feller. I used to have a garage microwave for experimental use.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 2:30 PM gregebert wrote:
> > Short lived. No Hg. I have to replace them pretty frequently in one of
> my clocks (one every 6 months or so), they appear to develop infernal
> shorts... cheap as
Hi Paul
I think I might did something as I tried to respond to your message , but I am
not sure if I managed to delete anything
On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 10:30:23 PM GMT+3, Paul Andrews
wrote:
Interesting. Was my comment deleted?
On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 10:05:24 AM
> Short lived. No Hg. I have to replace them pretty frequently in one of my
clocks (one every 6 months or so), they appear to develop infernal
shorts... cheap as nuts though...
IN-1's ??? I gave-up on those years ago when I found internal shorts
literally growing between cathodes. Zapping
Interesting. Was my comment deleted?
On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 10:05:24 AM UTC-4 nickja...@gmail.com wrote:
> What's wrong with nipples? Hehe... How about the little baby IN-17 with
> a nipple on the side?
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 2:56 AM Paul Andrews wrote:
>
>> People think they are
It's on the list of crazy crap to try with my ever-growing junk pile! Most
important is that last night I got the mini split ceiling cassette hung in
the shop and running. Hoping 1 ton is enough in this TX heat.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 11:09 AM Audrey wrote:
> Ooh, good luck with that nick
>
>
Ooh, good luck with that nick
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022, 12:03 PM Nick Andrews wrote:
> Yes, I think I bought a hundred of them some time back, and some of other
> 'cheap' at the time ones. Haven't looked at prices lately, too scary. The
> seller included some extras for breakage, and a few did
Yes, I think I bought a hundred of them some time back, and some of other
'cheap' at the time ones. Haven't looked at prices lately, too scary. The
seller included some extras for breakage, and a few did have the filler nip
snapped off. I set those aside for experimenting once I get my high
Short lived. No Hg. I have to replace them pretty frequently in one of my
clocks (one every 6 months or so), they appear to develop infernal shorts...
cheap as nuts though...
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 2, 2022, at 07:11, Nick Andrews wrote:
>
>
> Yeah, that's what I typed, must've been
Yeah, that's what I typed, must've been autocorrect...yeah that's it...
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 9:07 AM Audrey wrote:
> Not to be that guy, but IN-2
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022, 10:05 AM Nick Andrews wrote:
>
>> What's wrong with nipples? Hehe... How about the little baby IN-17 with
>> a nipple
Not to be that guy, but IN-2
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022, 10:05 AM Nick Andrews wrote:
> What's wrong with nipples? Hehe... How about the little baby IN-17 with
> a nipple on the side?
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 2:56 AM Paul Andrews wrote:
>
>> People think they are ugly until they see them. Tubes
What's wrong with nipples? Hehe... How about the little baby IN-17 with a
nipple on the side?
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 2:56 AM Paul Andrews wrote:
> People think they are ugly until they see them. Tubes with nipples on top
> - now *they’re* ugly.
>
> On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:02:41 PM UTC-4
People think they are ugly until they see them. Tubes with nipples on top -
now *they’re* ugly.
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:02:41 PM UTC-4 Pramanicin wrote:
> Not dissimilar to NL934's, and they're quite nice looking IMO. Each to
> their own! CD47's, now they're *fugly*.
>
> On Fri, Jul
15 matches
Mail list logo
