[neonixie-l] Re: Inductor specs in threeneuron's HV PSU

2017-03-22 Thread 'threeneurons' via neonixie-l
Yep, when I saw the stock situation, I order some 82uH parts, and tested them, in excess of the recommended load. Worked great. I had already tested the RLB9014-101, way back when, but routinely ordered the RLB9012 part due to the extra safety margin. On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 2:24:48

[neonixie-l] Re: Inductor specs in threeneuron's HV PSU

2017-03-22 Thread Morten Mønsted
Thanks for your answer :) As I read you, I could use either RLB0914-101 or RLB9012-082 instead? I just checked and I can get the RLB0914-101 from my supplier of choice! On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 7:07:33 PM UTC+1, threeneurons wrote: > > The coil issued with the kit is a Bourns

[neonixie-l] Re: Inductor specs in threeneuron's HV PSU

2017-03-22 Thread 'threeneurons' via neonixie-l
The coil issued with the kit is a Bourns RLB9012-101. All major distributors (Mouser, Digikey, ...) are currently out of stock, and back ordered to May. That coil is a tad overkill for what the supply is rated to output. The RLB0914-101 will also work to more than the posted maximum specs. So

[neonixie-l] Re: Inductor specs in threeneuron's HV PSU

2017-03-22 Thread Tomasz Kowalczyk
You're right. The current rating for an inductor is an "up to" value, as it states the maximum current you can pass through that part without saturating the ferrite core. A saturated inductor in a boost converter will heat up and the converter won't reach designated voltage. Btw. I've read

[neonixie-l] Re: Inductor specs in threeneuron's HV PSU

2017-03-22 Thread Morten Mønsted
Thanks for your answer. All right, it does make sense, my concern was with the rest of the circuit only being designed for 1.4A. But I guess the key here is that it's "up to 1.4A", which I will never reach, even thought the rating is higher. On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 11:47:14 AM UTC+1,

[neonixie-l] Re: Inductor specs in threeneuron's HV PSU

2017-03-22 Thread Nick
A higher-current-rated inductor of the same uH value and same type will be fine - inductor #4 is likely as good as the original... Nick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails