Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Putting ZM1350 behind perspex

2019-10-11 Thread Richard Scales
My initial thought was to go for clear. I am only trying to find out whether there may be any benefit or perceived advantage in using the tints. I'll post results of testing.Sent from my Huawei phone Original Message Subject: Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Putting ZM1350 behind perspexFrom: Nicholas Stock To: neonixie-l@googlegroups.comCC: What’s wrong with clear? Why hide the ZM1350? The old instruments that used these had filters etc and I think that’s a shame as you don’t get to see the inner ‘workings’.just my 2 cents:-)Cheers,NickSent from my iPhoneOn Oct 11, 2019, at 08:37, Richard Scales  wrote:Thank you all for your feedback.I have ordered up some samples of translucent Orange and Florescent Orange (whatever that is) and will perform some tests. If I can get my act together I'll post pictures here.On Friday, 11 October 2019 07:28:24 UTC+1, Richard Scales  wrote:I have a project where I will be using ZM1350's in Smart-Sockets. I have used Harwin socket pins on the sockets and the ZM1350's are easy to insert and remove.Because they are easy to remove I want to put a perspex front on the device to stop them falling out!I was going to use clear perspex / Acrylic but I find that I can also get red and orange tinted perspex as well as red and orange 'florescent'.I was just wondering if anyone in the group had an experience or opinions on this and the suitability of using coloured instead of clear?Thank you all.Richard



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/66edd847-9893-41d0-bd98-35987846a61e%40googlegroups.com.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/neonixie-l/qdfWCcSRn2I/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/C457BDBA-DEA6-4194-BC69-E58D7041473C%40gmail.com.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/mmdjfkm0fqoj-14zfj4-auvq9g-72vzlkvzvpa77qmrq3blbdxu-k64b5e8rp6316247wq-73poyh-pa3m4kgvc2wofm60xz-bpfdsuelvuv2-fgml6tpq2vq8yw0j54-obhsqha3bjzo-banddi-bv7qbk.1570812447643%40email.android.com.


Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Putting ZM1350 behind perspex

2019-10-11 Thread Nicholas Stock
What’s wrong with clear? Why hide the ZM1350? The old instruments that used 
these had filters etc and I think that’s a shame as you don’t get to see the 
inner ‘workings’.just my 2 cents:-)

Cheers,

Nick

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 11, 2019, at 08:37, Richard Scales  wrote:
> 
> 
> Thank you all for your feedback.
> 
> I have ordered up some samples of translucent Orange and Florescent Orange 
> (whatever that is) and will perform some tests. If I can get my act together 
> I'll post pictures here.
> 
>> On Friday, 11 October 2019 07:28:24 UTC+1, Richard Scales wrote:
>> I have a project where I will be using ZM1350's in Smart-Sockets. I have 
>> used Harwin socket pins on the sockets and the ZM1350's are easy to insert 
>> and remove.
>> Because they are easy to remove I want to put a perspex front on the device 
>> to stop them falling out!
>> I was going to use clear perspex / Acrylic but I find that I can also get 
>> red and orange tinted perspex as well as red and orange 'florescent'.
>> I was just wondering if anyone in the group had an experience or opinions on 
>> this and the suitability of using coloured instead of clear?
>> Thank you all.
>> 
>> Richard
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "neonixie-l" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/66edd847-9893-41d0-bd98-35987846a61e%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/C457BDBA-DEA6-4194-BC69-E58D7041473C%40gmail.com.


[neonixie-l] Re: Putting ZM1350 behind perspex

2019-10-11 Thread Richard Scales
Thank you all for your feedback.

I have ordered up some samples of translucent Orange and Florescent Orange 
(whatever that is) and will perform some tests. If I can get my act 
together I'll post pictures here.

On Friday, 11 October 2019 07:28:24 UTC+1, Richard Scales wrote:
>
> I have a project where I will be using ZM1350's in Smart-Sockets. I have 
> used Harwin socket pins on the sockets and the ZM1350's are easy to insert 
> and remove.
> Because they are easy to remove I want to put a perspex front on the 
> device to stop them falling out!
> I was going to use clear perspex / Acrylic but I find that I can also get 
> red and orange tinted perspex as well as red and orange 'florescent'.
> I was just wondering if anyone in the group had an experience or opinions 
> on this and the suitability of using coloured instead of clear?
> Thank you all.
>
> Richard
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/66edd847-9893-41d0-bd98-35987846a61e%40googlegroups.com.


RE: [neonixie-l] Re: Putting ZM1350 behind perspex

2019-10-11 Thread Tidak Ada
Ever thought at polaroid film?

Enhances the contrast significant because of reduction of the incident licht, 
does not affect the color and as a slight reduction of the brightness.

There are  even light colored Pola-foils A long time ago I bought a red 
Polaroid filter from Monsanto for enhancement of -in that time weak lighting- 
LED-displays

 

eric

 

Van: neonixie-l@googlegroups.com [mailto:neonixie-l@googlegroups.com] Namens 
newxito
Verzonden: vrijdag 11 oktober 2019 11:09
Aan: neonixie-l
Onderwerp: [neonixie-l] Re: Putting ZM1350 behind perspex

 

I've done a few tests in the past. With the acrylic that I got, the result was 
as follow:

translucent red: converts the orange glow to red, reduces contrast and 
brightness

translucent orange: keeps the orange glow, slightly improves contrast, 
maintains brightness

translucent brown: keeps the orange glow, slightly reduces contrast and 
brightness



Am Freitag, 11. Oktober 2019 08:28:24 UTC+2 schrieb Richard Scales:

I have a project where I will be using ZM1350's in Smart-Sockets. I have used 
Harwin socket pins on the sockets and the ZM1350's are easy to insert and 
remove.

Because they are easy to remove I want to put a perspex front on the device to 
stop them falling out!

I was going to use clear perspex / Acrylic but I find that I can also get red 
and orange tinted perspex as well as red and orange 'florescent'.

I was just wondering if anyone in the group had an experience or opinions on 
this and the suitability of using coloured instead of clear?

Thank you all.

 

Richard

 

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/a341f274-c50c-47ee-9d0a-b8769981aee6%40googlegroups.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/a341f274-c50c-47ee-9d0a-b8769981aee6%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
 .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/!%26!AAAYAPDddShx705MuX20yCpp0vvCgAAAEMvq%2BIkhV2NBsdo8KqgWvEUBAA%3D%3D%40zeelandnet.nl.


[neonixie-l] Re: Putting ZM1350 behind perspex

2019-10-11 Thread newxito
 

I've done a few tests in the past. With the acrylic that I got, the result 
was as follow:

translucent red: converts the orange glow to red, reduces contrast and 
brightness

translucent orange: keeps the orange glow, slightly improves contrast, 
maintains brightness

translucent brown: keeps the orange glow, slightly reduces contrast and 
brightness


Am Freitag, 11. Oktober 2019 08:28:24 UTC+2 schrieb Richard Scales:
>
> I have a project where I will be using ZM1350's in Smart-Sockets. I have 
> used Harwin socket pins on the sockets and the ZM1350's are easy to insert 
> and remove.
> Because they are easy to remove I want to put a perspex front on the 
> device to stop them falling out!
> I was going to use clear perspex / Acrylic but I find that I can also get 
> red and orange tinted perspex as well as red and orange 'florescent'.
> I was just wondering if anyone in the group had an experience or opinions 
> on this and the suitability of using coloured instead of clear?
> Thank you all.
>
> Richard
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/a341f274-c50c-47ee-9d0a-b8769981aee6%40googlegroups.com.