> On 27 Jun 2019, at 14:57, Julia Boes wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks Brian and Chris for your comments! I incorporated the changes.
>
> Here's the updated webrev:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/jboes/webrev_8226825/webrev.01/
Thanks for the updated webrev, Julia. You have my Review.
-C
Hi,
Thanks Brian and Chris for your comments! I incorporated the changes.
Here's the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/jboes/webrev_8226825/webrev.01/
Cheers,
Julia
On 26/06/2019 21:32, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Julia,
On 26 Jun 2019, at 18:33, Julia Boes wrote:
Hi,
Please
> On 27 Jun 2019, at 12:56, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>
> On 27/06/2019 12:30, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> It is not an issue because there is an implicit reference ( from the
>> nested class ). If we believe that the publisher is not strictly needed,
>> then let's make the nested Subscription static, wh
On 27/06/2019 12:30, Chris Hegarty wrote:
It is not an issue because there is an implicit reference ( from the
nested class ). If we believe that the publisher is not strictly needed,
then let's make the nested Subscription static, which will mean no ref,
and is explicit. Concerns?
Not from me
> On 27 Jun 2019, at 12:16, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>
> Hi Micahel, Chris,
>
> On 27/06/2019 11:50, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8222968/webrev.1/index.html
>> If I’m not mistaken, then after this change there will be no explicit
>> reference to the PullPublisher.
Hi Chris,
On 27/06/2019, 11:50, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Michael,
On 27 Jun 2019, at 11:08, Michael McMahon wrote:
Could I get the following change reviewed please:
The change is as suggested in the report and the test case
is based on the one provided.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/82
Hi Micahel, Chris,
On 27/06/2019 11:50, Chris Hegarty wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8222968/webrev.1/index.html
If I’m not mistaken, then after this change there will be no explicit
reference to the PullPublisher. There is an implicit reference from the
nested Subscription. I thi
Michael,
> On 27 Jun 2019, at 11:08, Michael McMahon
> wrote:
>
> Could I get the following change reviewed please:
>
> The change is as suggested in the report and the test case
> is based on the one provided.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8222968/webrev.1/index.html
If I’m not m
Could I get the following change reviewed please:
The change is as suggested in the report and the test case
is based on the one provided.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8222968/webrev.1/index.html
Thanks,
Michael.
Daniel,
> On 26 Jun 2019, at 16:30, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please find below a patch for:
>
> 8226514: Replace wildcard address with loopback or local host in
> tests - part 17
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8226514
>
>
> webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfu
10 matches
Mail list logo