On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 18:55:53 GMT, Andrey Turbanov
wrote:
> 8258422: Cleanup unnecessary null comparison before instanceof check in
> java.base
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 022bc9f0
Author:Andrey Turbanov
Committer: Aleksei Efimov
URL: https://git.openjdk.ja
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 23:29:53 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
>> @AlekseiEfimov `HttpClientImpl` is not in `java.base` module. So I think
>> it's better to not touch it under this PR.
>
> To double check that docs build will be stable after integration the
> following actions have been performed:
> -
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:12:24 GMT, Andrey Turbanov
wrote:
>> Hi @turbanoff,
>> This PR is ready for integration - `JDK-8258657` has been resolved.
>> You can proceed with issuing `integrate` bot command. Then I will `sponsor`
>> it.
>> But before that, I would like to ask if you would like to ta
The client could drain if yo close the stream,but I think it’s more flexible If
the Application decides if it want to do that (it could be a config option but
I guess it’s uncommon that you stop reading and. It want to discard data.
Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
___
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:13 PM Nicolas Henneaux
wrote:
>
> Thanks Simone, that makes sense. I haven't thought there is actually no other
> way for the server to know the response is fully consumed or not.
Just to be clear, it's not a server problem.
The server won't read the next request
Thanks Simone, that makes sense. I haven't thought there is actually no
other way for the server to know the response is fully consumed or not.
Thanks all!
Nicolas
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 22:08, Simone Bordet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:28 PM Nicolas Henneaux
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:28 PM Nicolas Henneaux
wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for your quick feedback.
>
> Indeed if I fetch all the bytes, the connection is kept. What's the reason
> behind this behaviour?
It's normal behavior.
The server may have not finished to send all the bytes in
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for your quick feedback.
Indeed if I fetch all the bytes, the connection is kept. What's the reason
behind this behaviour?
Best regards,
Nicolas
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 21:00, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> If I understand correctly you are closing the input stream wi
Hi Nicolas,
If I understand correctly you are closing the input stream without
draining the bytes. With HTTP/1.1 this will force the connection
to get closed. This is the expected behavior.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 11/01/2021 20:29, Nicolas Henneaux wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem when using J
Hi,
I have a problem when using Java HttpClient with a proxy and HTTP/1.1
version. When using a stream body handler, there is no re-use of the TCP
connection.
When using another body handler
(java.net.http.HttpResponse.BodyHandlers#ofString()
or java.net.http.HttpResponse.BodyHandlers#discarding)
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:24:23 GMT, Volker Simonis wrote:
> JDK-8237578 exposes some SocketExceptions directly which were previously
> wrapped inside an SSLException. The change updated one test to take this new
> behaviour into account (i.e. TrustTrustedCert.java) but apparently missed
> other
JDK-8237578 exposes some SocketExceptions directly which were previously
wrapped inside an SSLException. The change updated one test to take this new
behaviour into account (i.e. TrustTrustedCert.java) but apparently missed other
tests.
The fix for the other tests is similar like the fix for Tr
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:57:00 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
>> 8258422: Cleanup unnecessary null comparison before instanceof check in
>> java.base
>
> Hi @turbanoff,
> This PR is ready for integration - `JDK-8258657` has been resolved.
> You can proceed with issuing `integrate` bot command. Then I
On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 18:55:53 GMT, Andrey Turbanov
wrote:
> 8258422: Cleanup unnecessary null comparison before instanceof check in
> java.base
Hi @turbanoff,
This PR is ready for integration - `JDK-8258657` has been resolved.
You can proceed with issuing `integrate` bot command. Then I will `sp
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 04:34:12 GMT, Jayashree S Kumar
wrote:
>> Issue
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8243376
>>
>> Problem
>>
>> The scenario is:
>> - Some specified target hostname resolves to two IP addresses (always the
>> same address pair).
>> - The DNS resolved order of
15 matches
Mail list logo