Hello,
I have evaluated https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8071458
I have tried to use different symbols in networking interface name in
Linux. I have added a comment to
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8071458
I am able to use symbols: -, +, =, #, @.
I was UNABLE to use: ?,
On 10 Feb 2015, at 15:28, Konstantin Shefov konstantin.she...@oracle.com
wrote:
Hello,
I have evaluated https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8071458
6933879 allowed a minimal additional set of non-alphanumeric characters.
8071458 was filed to examine the potential specification
Hi Sean,
I have tried to use different symbols in networking interface name in
Linux. I have added a comment to
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8071458
I am able to use symbols: -, +, =, #, @.
I was UNABLE to use: ?, ~, $, *, !, [, (, , ^, |,
/, : and \.
My network interface name
Hello,
Please approve the direct backport of the bug fix to 8u-dev
Patch applies cleanly to JDK 8u.
The bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6933879
The webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/6933879/webrev.01/
JDK 9 changeset:
Konstantin,
can you hold off pushing this fix to jdk8u for the moment ? It's a P4
and could have behavioural consequences (something we try and avoid in
update releases). I see JDK-8071458 was logged to track IPv6 scope
specifications. Let's see how this soaks into JDK 9 over coming days and
