Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 07/09/10 12:10, Michael McMahon wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 07/09/10 11:27, Michael McMahon wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 07/09/10 10:10, Michael McMahon wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
Michael,
CR 6967684: httpserver using a non thread-safe SimpleDateFormat
Bu
On 07/09/10 12:10, Michael McMahon wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 07/09/10 11:27, Michael McMahon wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 07/09/10 10:10, Michael McMahon wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
Michael,
CR 6967684: httpserver using a non thread-safe SimpleDateFormat
Bug description says it
Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 07/09/10 11:27, Michael McMahon wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 07/09/10 10:10, Michael McMahon wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
Michael,
CR 6967684: httpserver using a non thread-safe SimpleDateFormat
Bug description says it all. I guess in reality this may have gone
On 07/09/10 11:27, Michael McMahon wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 07/09/10 10:10, Michael McMahon wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
Michael,
CR 6967684: httpserver using a non thread-safe SimpleDateFormat
Bug description says it all. I guess in reality this may have gone
unseen for so long bec
Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 07/09/10 10:10, Michael McMahon wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
Michael,
CR 6967684: httpserver using a non thread-safe SimpleDateFormat
Bug description says it all. I guess in reality this may have gone
unseen for so long because, if two or more threads were servicing
r
On 07/09/10 10:10, Michael McMahon wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
Michael,
CR 6967684: httpserver using a non thread-safe SimpleDateFormat
Bug description says it all. I guess in reality this may have gone
unseen for so long because, if two or more threads were servicing
requests the dates they
Chris Hegarty wrote:
Michael,
CR 6967684: httpserver using a non thread-safe SimpleDateFormat
Bug description says it all. I guess in reality this may have gone
unseen for so long because, if two or more threads were servicing
requests the dates they would be generating should be fairly simil
