Re: RFR 8058824: Drop TwoStacks socket implementation in jdk9 [win] - Part I

2014-09-23 Thread Michael McMahon
Ivan, Okay. I see the "part 1" in the subject line now, but maybe the bug should be updated to define the scope of the change and we should file a separate bug report then. I'm okay with leaving the class with the current name. What about the datagram socket code? It might make sense to includ

Re: RFR 8058824: Drop TwoStacks socket implementation in jdk9 [win] - Part I

2014-09-23 Thread Ivan Gerasimov
Thanks Michael! On 23.09.2014 13:41, Michael McMahon wrote: Hi Ivan, Did you look at the possibility of removing the TwoStacks class altogether? For Solaris/Linux etc. ipv4 only and ipv6/v4 are all handled in the same impl class with just a switch at socket creation time, selecting AF_INET or

Re: RFR 8058824: Drop TwoStacks socket implementation in jdk9 [win] - Part I

2014-09-23 Thread Michael McMahon
Hi Ivan, Did you look at the possibility of removing the TwoStacks class altogether? For Solaris/Linux etc. ipv4 only and ipv6/v4 are all handled in the same impl class with just a switch at socket creation time, selecting AF_INET or AF_INET6. If there is a good reason to keep the implementati