Hi Alex,
I've just quickly checked this and it seems worthwile to me to downport 8035653
to JDK8.
As the patch will probably not apply cleanly to JDK8 after unshuffling [1] ,
you will need to create a new public review and post it on this mailing list.
Some JDK8 reviewer needs to review it and
Could I get the following JDK 10 reviews please.
They are minor doc cleanups, that do not involve spec changes
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177457
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177452
8177457 Syntax errors in URLConnection class documentation
8177452 Syntax errors in C
> On 19 Apr 2017, at 17:36, Michael McMahon
> wrote:
>
> Could I get the following JDK 10 reviews please.
> They are minor doc cleanups, that do not involve spec changes
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177457
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177452
>
> 8177457 Syntax
Hi Michael,
Looks fine.
But they are applicable to JDK 9 and as doc changes are acceptable.
Why JDK 10?
Roger
On 4/19/2017 12:36 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
Could I get the following JDK 10 reviews please.
They are minor doc cleanups, that do not involve spec changes
https://bugs.openjdk.jav
