Hi,
here is the updated webrev with modifications to the problem list and reverting
the static imports: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8207404.1/
It went fine through our test system so I think it's good now.
Please review.
Thanks
Christoph
From: Chris Hegarty
Sent: Donnerstag,
Hi,
Please find below a small fix for:
8216561: HttpClient: The logic of retry on connect exception is inverted
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8216561
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8216561/webrev.01/
The patch now allows retry on connect exception, ensuring
that t
Hi Daniel,
> webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8216561/webrev.01/
>
>
>
126 private static class ConnectTimeoutTracker {
127 final Optional max;
128 final AtomicLong startTime = new AtomicLong();
129 ConnectTimeoutTracker(Optional connectTimeout) {
Hi Christoph,
Had a look at the latest webrev and everything looks OK to me.
Have also re-tested on my AIX systems and all tests oass OK.
Thanks
Steve Groeger
IBM Runtime Technologies
Hursley, Winchester
Tel: (44) 1962 816911 Mobex: 279990 Mobile: 07718 517 129
Fax (44) 1962 816800
Lotus Notes
Hi Andrej,
Yes that looks like my first implementation. But then
I reflected that avoiding to map Optional to Duration
and then back to a new Optional containing the same
duration could be avoided by simply storing the original
optional obtained from the HttpClient.
The current code only creates
Hi Daniel,
Yes that looks like my first implementation. But then
> I reflected that avoiding to map Optional to Duration
> and then back to a new Optional containing the same
> duration could be avoided by simply storing the original
> optional obtained from the HttpClient.
>
> The current code on
On 18/01/2019 08:54, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi,
here is the updated webrev with modifications to the problem list and
reverting the static imports:
_http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8207404.1/__
I think this is ok.
-Chris.
Hi Andrej,
On 18/01/2019 14:03, Andrej Golovnin wrote:
Is creating new Optionals a real problem? And before you answer please
remember what Donald Knuth said: The real problem is that programmers
have spent far too much time worrying about efficiency in the wrong
places and at the wrong times;
On 18/01/2019 14:24, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Andrej,
On 18/01/2019 14:03, Andrej Golovnin wrote:
Is creating new Optionals a real problem? And before you answer please
remember what Donald Knuth said: The real problem is that programmers
have spent far too much time worrying about efficiency in
Hi Daniel,
> Right - here is a better implementation anyway:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8216561/webrev.02/
>
Looks much better. Thanks a lot!
Best regards,
Andrej Golovnin
Hello,
I am tasting java.net.http.HttpClient with
openjdk version "11.0.1" 2018-10-16
OpenJDK Runtime Environment AdoptOpenJDK (build 11.0.1+13)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM AdoptOpenJDK (build 11.0.1+13, mixed mode)
on Mac OS X 10.14.2.
Consider the case when server responds with bad (invalid f
11 matches
Mail list logo