Thanks for the new test Patrick!
It looks good to me.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 02/09/2019 11:23, Patrick Concannon wrote:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8230159
Webrev for fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/pconcann/8230159/webrevs/webrev.2/
That looks good to me Julia!
best regards,
-- daniel
On 02/09/2019 16:44, Julia Boes wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the review, Michael and Vyom. I removed server.close() from
the run method.
Updated webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/jboes/8171405/webrev.03/
Regards,
Julia
Looks fine to me Daniel.
- Michael.
On 02/09/2019, 14:00, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi,
(cc-ing security dev for the changes in
test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/templates/SSLSocketTemplate.java
which is updated to allow for binding on a specific
IP Address)
Please find below a patch for:
8230435: Replace
Hi Patrick,
New test looks good to me, minor bit jtreg tag order in not correct , generally @run tag comes last.
Thanks,
Vyom
- Original message -From: Daniel Fuchs Sent by: "net-dev" To: Patrick Concannon , OpenJDK Network Dev list Cc:Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RFR[8230159]: Add test
Hi folks,
Assuming the premise of this bug is correct, could I get a review for
the following:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8219640
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~robm/8219640/webrev.01/
Windows rejects a lookup for "127.0.0.1 test" where getaddrinfo on
non-Windows platforms resolves
Hi Jaikiran,
Tests were successful and I pushed it...
best regards,
-- daniel
On 02/09/2019 12:29, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
On 02/09/2019 12:23, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
This does look better. I have updated the code to use this construct and
the new webrev is at
On 03/09/2019 15:59, Rob McKenna wrote:
Hi folks,
Assuming the premise of this bug is correct, could I get a review for
the following:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8219640
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~robm/8219640/webrev.01/
Windows rejects a lookup for "127.0.0.1 test" where
On 3 Sep 2019, at 16:49, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> On 03/09/2019 15:59, Rob McKenna wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Assuming the premise of this bug is correct, could I get a review for
>> the following:
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8219640
>>
> On 3 Sep 2019, at 17:29, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> ...
> Welcome to Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS (GNU/Linux 4.15.0-54-generic x86_64)
>
> * Documentation: https://help.ubuntu.com
> * Management: https://landscape.canonical.com
> * Support:https://ubuntu.com/advantage
> ...
> $ uname -a
>
On 03/09/2019 17:35, Chris Hegarty wrote:
:
From the same Linux system:
$ ldd --version
ldd (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.23-0ubuntu11) 2.23
Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or
Thanks for the pointer to the passing host Alan. With that I was able to
track down:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=108bc4049f8ae82710aec26a92ffdb4b439c83fd
So it looks like this has recently been fixed in glibc.
-Rob
On 03/09/19 17:47, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On
Thank you Daniel.
-Jaikiran
On 03/09/19 10:20 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Hi Jaikiran,
>
> Tests were successful and I pushed it...
>
> best regards,
>
> -- daniel
>
> On 02/09/2019 12:29, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> On 02/09/2019 12:23, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>>> This does look better. I have updated the
12 matches
Mail list logo
