Looks fine to me Rob
- Michael
On 25/09/15 13:54, Rob McKenna wrote:
Good point. I'll remove that pre-push.
-Rob
On 25/09/15 11:57, Mark Sheppard wrote:
Hi Rob,
looks fine ... the "him" variable in the
Java_java_net_Inet4AddressImpl_isReachable0
would appear not to be used now,
Hi Rob,
looks fine ... the "him" variable in the
Java_java_net_Inet4AddressImpl_isReachable0
would appear not to be used now, so could probably be removed with its
call on memset ?
regards
Mark
On 24/09/2015 15:45, Rob McKenna wrote:
Please ignore the formatting errors. Thats either a
Good point. I'll remove that pre-push.
-Rob
On 25/09/15 11:57, Mark Sheppard wrote:
Hi Rob,
looks fine ... the "him" variable in the
Java_java_net_Inet4AddressImpl_isReachable0
would appear not to be used now, so could probably be removed with its
call on memset ?
regards
Mark
Hi folks,
The recent change to isReachable (8133015:
InetAddress.isReachable(tmout) returning wrong value on Windows for IPv6
- http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/59ff6cd9535d) neglected
to take the specified interface into account for ipv4.
This change ensures that isReachable
Please ignore the formatting errors. Thats either a problem with hg diff
or webrev, but its fixed in the repo.
-Rob
On 24/09/15 15:43, Rob McKenna wrote:
Hi folks,
The recent change to isReachable (8133015:
InetAddress.isReachable(tmout) returning wrong value on Windows for IPv6
-
