Re: rfc: excluding debug output

2005-04-21 Thread Robert Story
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:36:40 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> Well, we could always extend that MIB to add an extra column DS> (included/excluded) - presumably defaulting to included. Fine by me, on both counts. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: Archive:

Re: Setting the sender address in outgoing SNMP trap packets

2005-04-21 Thread Shobana Sampath
If I do not set the value myself, I am unable to see the value added by build_snmp_pdu call. The documentation says this agent_addr is for v1 traps and since I send out v2c traps, is it possible it is ignoring this value. Thanks. /Shobana --- Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-0

Re: rfc: excluding debug output

2005-04-21 Thread Dave Shield
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 15:32, Robert Story wrote: > The only missing piece is that excluded tokens will not be included > in the debug mib, since there is no way to indicate their status there. Well, we could always extend that MIB to add an extra column (included/excluded) - presumably defaulting

Re: rfc: changing default callback priority

2005-04-21 Thread Robert Story
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:28:13 -0700 Wes wrote: WH> Robert> It is an integer, so it would allow negative numbers. If it's WH> Robert> common, then that might be an argument for just leaving it as WH> Robert> is. WH> WH> That's probably what I'd do. There is no reason, IMHO, not to and in WH> fact i

Re: rfc: excluding debug output

2005-04-21 Thread Robert Story
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:25:50 -0700 Wes wrote: WH> >> Option 1) any token prefixed with '-' will be excluded. eg WH> >> WH> >> -D -parse-mibs,parse,other,-different WH> WH> Dave> That was my immediate preference. WH> WH> And mine. go for it. ok, done. The only missing piece is that excluded tok

Re: 5.2.1 make test fails

2005-04-21 Thread Aaron Walker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Story wrote: > On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 00:24:39 -0400 Aaron wrote: > AW> 47:testing RFC-1213 MIB SNMPv1 access > AW> 47.9:Access table at.atTable by SNMPv1...FAIL > AW> 47.33:Access table ip.ipNetToMediaTable by SNMPv1...FAIL > AW> 47: 1

Re: 5.2.1 make test fails

2005-04-21 Thread Dave Shield
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 13:49, Robert Story wrote: > AW> 47.9:Access table at.atTable by SNMPv1...FAIL > AW> 47.33:Access table ip.ipNetToMediaTable by SNMPv1...FAIL > Neither, really. These particular tests are trying to access every object in > the RFC-1213 MIB, using v1, v2c and v3. The two 'fai

Re: 5.2.1 make test fails

2005-04-21 Thread Robert Story
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 00:24:39 -0400 Aaron wrote: AW> 47:testing RFC-1213 MIB SNMPv1 access AW> 47.9:Access table at.atTable by SNMPv1...FAIL AW> 47.33:Access table ip.ipNetToMediaTable by SNMPv1...FAIL AW> 47: 108 total, 106 passed, 2 failed.FAIL AW> Are these tests failing because the