Re: snmpset syntax error

2005-04-28 Thread res0d1zz
I  think you mixed v3 and v1/2. It seems, by default,  your snmp is v3. Have you configured v3 right in both snmpd.conf files? If you want to use v1/2, you need to use -v 2c or -v 1 for snmpset.   Res   - Original Message - From: Elia, Ralph J, WCS To: [email protected]

Re: RPM version of Net-SNMP for ARM

2005-04-28 Thread Alexander W. Janssen
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 06:17:30PM +0200, Stage Iup - Fabrice & Frédéric wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]$snmpd > snmpd: error in loading shared libraries: libcrypto.so.4: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory Install the OpenSSL-libraries and their development files, if they

snmpset syntax error

2005-04-28 Thread Elia, Ralph J, WCS
Hello,   I'm looking for assistance on the following snmpset command and parameters, and the output message   # Execute SNMPSETsnmpset -c mycommunityname -r 5 -t 10 $router .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.50.192.168.1.1 s update.tmp   snmpset: No securityName specified": Event not found when I use the -

Timeout issue with Net-SNMP on MAC OS X 10.3.8

2005-04-28 Thread Pete Parks
Has anyone installed and used Net-SNMP on a Mac OS X 10.3.8 system yet? If what configuration on the build and install works, because I can configure, make, install and run snmpd but that about it. If I give a command to execute like " snmpgetnext -v 3 -n none -u noAuthUser -l noAuthNoPriv test.ne

Re: Create own plugin: have a question

2005-04-28 Thread Emmanuel Doguet
Dave Shield wrote: OK - then the cache helper is an ideal solution for you. That's pretty much what this does. It will load your data the first time that a query arrives (*not* when the agent starts up), and will release and re-load it whenever another request arrives, and the cached data is "too

Re: Create own plugin: have a question

2005-04-28 Thread Dave Shield
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 11:45, Emmanuel Doguet wrote: > Dave Shield wrote: > > [ First - *please* don't mail me privately > > I see it after send (my owns ML work with a reply :P), sorry. Don't worry - that's a standard block of text that I include whenever this happens. I'm well aware tha

Re: Create own plugin: have a question

2005-04-28 Thread Emmanuel Doguet
Dave Shield wrote: [ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy. Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn and offer advice. Th

Re: Create own plugin: have a question

2005-04-28 Thread Dave Shield
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy. Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn and offer advice. Thanks. ] On Thu

Re: Create own plugin: have a question

2005-04-28 Thread Emmanuel Doguet
Hello, Dave Shield wrote: Remember that the get_{first,next}_data_point routines are used to walk through the table in order to determine the appropriate row to use. This all happens before the main handler is called to actually do the main task of answering the SNMP request. This means that t

Re: How to implement tables in 5.0.6

2005-04-28 Thread Dave Shield
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 22:38, Toth, Gregory S wrote: > We are in the transition process from 4.2.x to 5.0.6 > Doing scalars in 5.0.6 is fairly straightforward but the table > implementation is very different. Probably because there are now several different possible alternatives, depending on the c

Memory-Leak in UCD-SNMP 4.2.5 and 4.2.6

2005-04-28 Thread Pedot, Wolfgang
Hi, I do not know if anyone supports these sources any more but I found a memleak in UCD-SNMP 4.2.5 yesterday. It is a special case but it eats up memory very quickly: If there is an SNMPv1 GET-Request which contains multiple OIDs AND there are unknown OIDs in it AND there are known OIDs before

Re: Create own plugin: have a question

2005-04-28 Thread Dave Shield
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 17:14, Emmanuel Doguet wrote: > But I want use dynamic allocating, so I allocate my data (a simple > table) in "*_get_first_data_point" and freeing in *_get_next_data_point" > when index is out of range. Nope - that doesn't sound right. Remember that the get_{first,next}_dat