Is there a wrapped implementation that provides basic get, getnext and set
operations? If not can someone point me in the correct direction of the
library interfaces that would need wrapping.
Thanks,
Paul
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
T
I tested on our system, not standard linux.
I dig into the code and found that it frees wrong memory when it is in
non- NETSNMP_TRANSPORT_FLAG_STREAM situation.
It is in snmp_api.c at line:5302 on release version 5.0.10.2.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Story [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:35:37 -0800 Fong wrote:
FT> I have imported the security fix for NETSNMP_TRANSPORT_FLAG_STREAM from
FT> 5.0.10.2 to v5.0.9 I am using.
Have you tested a stock 5.0.10.2 build? Does it leak?
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
u
checking winsock.h usability... no
checking winsock.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: winsock.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: winsock.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: winsock.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: winsock.h:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:30:57 -0800 (PST) md wrote:
MS> I was using ucd-snmp 4.2.6 earlier ,now i am using net-snmp 5.2.1.2.
MS> With net-snmp 5.2.1.2 iam getting only two variables Interface number and
MS> index from Interface MIB. Earlier i used to get whole interface mib
MS> details from my devic
DS> Now I'm confused.
DS> You say that you're running 5.0.9, but the problem was only
introduced
DS> in 5.0.10.2. I don't understand how you can be seeing this problem
DS>with 5.0.9 code?
I have imported the security fix for NETSNMP_TRANSPORT_FLAG_STREAM from
5.0.10.2 to v5.0.9 I am using.
Than
I saw statement "Note that the single session API uses the existing callback
mechanisms in the SNMP library. This means a callbakc function can not use
the single API to furthre process the session"
Can a call back function decare a new session, and perform actions on the
new session?
somethi
aakansha rajvi wrote:
With the information I got, my OS supports. But by default (if no
port number is specified) the agent listens at 161. So will net-snmp
agent supports for this kinda accessing same port 161 by more than one
virtual IP Address at the same time?
Yes it can if you confi
On 11/4/05, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 17:45:09 +0530 aakansha wrote:AR> I restarted the network and started the agent with the IP AddressAR> "snmpd -f -Le 192.162.9.2 <
http://192.162.9.2>"AR>AR> The agent got started. Now in another shell I executed, "snmpd -f -LeA
Good day,
> I believe that you are actually referring to the load
> average table in the UCD-SNMP-MIB - yes? In fact, that
> table illustrates all three approaches I described yesterday:
Bah, yes, sorry. I had thought that these objects were in the host mib.
> - an integer representing a fi
Hi
I was using ucd-snmp 4.2.6 earlier ,now i am using net-snmp 5.2.1.2.
With net-snmp 5.2.1.2 iam getting only two variables Interface number and index from Interface MIB. Earlier i used to get whole interface mib details from my device which is running snmp agent.
Please let me know what could hav
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 18:19 -0800, Fong Tsui wrote:
[ description of possible memory leak]
> Is this a known bug? Do we have a fix? We are running 5.0.9 on linux.
> It seems the problem was introduced in net-snmp-5.0.10.2
Now I'm confused.
You say that you're running 5.0.9, but the problem
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 16:09 -0700, Darren Gamble wrote:
> Just to add to this, there are a number of "standard" OIDs that do use
> this method to represent floating point numbers; there is are load
> average objects in the host MIB that comes to mind
Talking about "the host MIB" is somewhat mislea
13 matches
Mail list logo
