Sending traps

Hi coders, I created a mib that check an service of my server and set the flag of the services as OK(0), Warning(1), Critical(2) NoResponse(3). So, i need that when change the state of flag the snmp send a trap. I tried to use the monitor in snmpd.conf, but if i put lines ( flag == 0or

Re: Net-SNMP 5.3.0.1 on aix 5.2 5.3 and possibly 5.1

I have since compiled on a 64 bit kernel and run under a 64 bit kernel. We get the same problem with the nlist I/O error. I modified the auto_nlist.c yesterday on that machine to include a definition for aix5 so that it would try and use knlist but encountered a different problem for which I

Re: warnings generated by compile

Lynette solaris 2.8, sparc sun4u, openssl 0.9.6, compiling with cc Lynette (forte C 6.2) Lynette configure: WARNING: sys/socketvar.h: present but cannot be compiled Thanks. you didn't say which version of net-snmp you were using, but we believe more recent releases may fix these

Suggestion for an addition to your FAQ

Good evening, I was spending several hours trying to get mib2c to run, but it was always complained with:/usr/lib/libnetsnmp.so.5: undefined symbol: RAND_bytesI did hours of searching on the web and on the newsgroups, and did not find a satisfactory answer. After enough playing around however, I

Undefined subroutine SNMP::initMib called

Hello everyone, :Can anyone help me with this problem. I've spent several days on it and it almost drive me mad. :I am using RedHat ES 4, and I've installed net-snmp 5.12. When I try to run a program, it got the following error message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] libexec]# ./check_snap_disk_snmp

Re: Undefined subroutine SNMP::initMib called

chen jacky wrote: :I am using RedHat ES 4, and I've installed net-snmp 5.12. When I try to run a program, it got the following error message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] libexec]# ./check_snap_disk_snmp -H 10.3.16.110 -C 1 -c 80 -w 90 Undefined subroutine SNMP::initMib called at ./check_snap_disk_snmp

version managment

hi, as the SF.net CVS is still/again unstable, i would like to suggest moving to svn. I brought up this topic on irc a few times already. Mediawiki used one of the last downtime for the migration aswell. [1] Advantages I see for the move: - similar UI as CVS - changesets - directory versioning

Re: version managment

darix wrote: as the SF.net CVS is still/again unstable, i would like to suggest moving to svn. Seconded. Wes has always argued that the users should decide which I tend to agree to. Now that SF.net is offering SVN services officially, the poll is overdue. Advantages I see for the move: