Wes Hardaker wrote:
>>"PP" == Passera Pablo-APP writes:
>
>
> PP> I submitted a bug and I'm trying to upload the patch for it but I
> PP> couldn't do it. I think it is because I submitted the patch as
> PP> nobody. The attach file option is not there. Is there any way to
> PP> upload a file
On 05/10/06, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the latest change(s) to configure.in in MAIN seem to have broken most of my
> nightly builds.
OK - try now.
It was fairly clear what I was trying to do.
Why couldn't configure just do What I Meant, rather than kick up a
fuss about a misplac
OK, I have checked the root permission. But, dynamic module still can't
be loaded.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:Active] root # ls -ld / /root /root/gtmmib.so
drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 1024 Oct 3 17:00 /
drwxr-xr-x5 root root 1024 Oct 5 12:03 /root
-rwxrwxrwx1 root root
> "FT" == Fong Tsui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FT> Here is the result by running ls -ld
FT> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Active] / # ls -ld / /root /root/gtmmib.so
FT> drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 1024 Oct 3 17:00 /
FT> drwxrwxrwx5 root root 1024 Oct 5 12:03 /root
FT> -rwxrwxr
-Coders,
the latest change(s) to configure.in in MAIN seem to have broken most of my
nightly builds. On those hosts that have OpenSSL at non-default places
(--with-openssl=/some/where on Solaris, AIX, ...) I now get:
configure: error: Asked to use OpenSSL but I couldn't find it.
The first broken
Here is the result by running ls -ld
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:Active] / # ls -ld / /root /root/gtmmib.so
drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 1024 Oct 3 17:00 /
drwxrwxrwx5 root root 1024 Oct 5 12:03 /root
-rwxrwxrwx1 root root 5988831 Oct 5 10:49 /root/gtmmib.so
I still
> "ss" == santhosh sundarasamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ss> Hi
ss> Is there a way to register call back function which needs to be
ss> invoked after all the SNMP agent init ( all MIB module init ) gets over?
ss> I had seen snmplib/callback.c, and tried snmp_regiter_callback()
ss> with SNMP
> "PP" == Passera Pablo-APP writes:
PP> I submitted a bug and I'm trying to upload the patch for it but I
PP> couldn't do it. I think it is because I submitted the patch as
PP> nobody. The attach file option is not there. Is there any way to
PP> upload a file as nobody? Can the bug be move i
Having made some progress with the HAL problems on Solaris, I though
it might be worth having a look at our HP-UX systems. And once again,
I'm running into a problem (unrelated to the HAL code) that's got me
stumped.
Having run a default configure with the current MAIN code base on an
HP-UX 10 sy
Hi,
When a get request is sent to the agent under the following
conditions:
- The get contains multiple OIDs
- All the OIDs belong to the SA, so the request is
proxied
- One of the OIDs does not exist in the SA
The agent, instead of re
Hi,
I submitted a bug and I'm trying to upload the patch for it but
I couldn't do it. I think it is because I submitted the patch as nobody.
The attach file option is not there. Is there any way to upload a file
as nobody? Can the bug be move it to my user now?
Thanks
Pablo
On 08/08/06, Fong Tsui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is snippet from output of "strace -f -o strace.log snmpd -c
> /config/snmpd.conf"
> 13145 open("/root/gtmmib.so", O_RDONLY) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
If this is still a problem (after a fairly lengthy break!), please
post the results
On 03/10/06, mahua dutta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>snmp sub-agent sends a Trap when
> even business application goes down. I do not know
> what snmpd do with that trap.
As Alex said, the master agent (snmpd) will forward this trap based on
the "trapsink" (or similar) directives t
On 02/10/06, vinh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm using a subagent and I'm trying to delete a table with old
> data and then remake it again with new data, since the number of rows
> are going to be dynamic. So I'm wondering what is the proper way to
> do this. As I'm doing it now I'm first
14 matches
Mail list logo
