On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:02:52 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> > "RS" == Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
WH>
WH> RS> +1
WH>
WH> Point of order: I'm not sure Dave has actually said yes even thouh he
WH> posted the patches?
I'm not sure what you're objecting to here (unless someone has already app
> "RS" == Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
WH> In theory, you could probably make the subagents also open a
WH> real SNMP port internally but it's certainly never been tested and
WH> probably not the right way to go.
RS> It definitely won't work if you need the information during the
> "RS" == Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> /MF (I do think Debian should stop violating RFC2741)
RS> Does it? Please point me to the respective areas.
Taking a complete guess, because I don't know to what he was
referring, does debian move the agentx socket from /var/agentx/maste
> "AN" == Anthony Novatsis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AN> One way to solve this is for Net-SNMP to kill the child process by
AN> sending a signal which the child process can handle and cleanly
AN> shutdown (using the kill function). This should be done before
AN> the waitpid call which will
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TA> I don't think this patch is complete yet.
FYI, I've reviewed both patches and they look well done.
I haven't voted yet, though. I think you may have just hit +3 and I'm
not going to vote against it anyway...
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, In
> "RS" == Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RS> +1
Point of order: I'm not sure Dave has actually said yes even thouh he
posted the patches?
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need t
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:13:23 +0200 Thomas wrote:
TA> Dave Shield wrote:
TA> > On 23/10/06, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TA> >> Dave has promised to post a provisional patch shortly. Assumed it
TA> >> works as
TA> >> described, please vote whether this change should go into 5.4.
TA> >
T
Dave Shield wrote:
> On 23/10/06, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dave has promised to post a provisional patch shortly. Assumed it
>> works as
>> described, please vote whether this change should go into 5.4.
>
> See attached.
I don't think this patch is complete yet. Attached please
On 23/10/06, redhouse101 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Inside subagent, some data are cached. What API function should I call to
> un-register the MIB and free cached data when my subagent is shutdown?
When the agent is shutdown, it should unregister all MIBs automatically.
If you need to do extra
Hello,
I use init_XXX to register MIB to a subagent.
init_XXX {
REGISTER_MIB("XXX", XXX_variables, variable4, XXX_variables_oid);}
Inside subagent, some data are cached. What API function should I call to un-register the MIB and free cached data when my subagent is shutdown?
RH101
---
On 23/10/06, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd suggest to rename init_mib() to netsnmp_init_mib() and only use this one
throughout our code, so it'll always use the correct function.
Dave has promised to post a provisional patch shortly. Assumed it works as
described, please vote wh
11 matches
Mail list logo
