Dana Burns wrote:
> Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>> What can apps/snmpcomm do that snmpset can't do if we assume that your
>> mib module is available?
>>
> Probably nothing other than conveniently packing the needed snmpsets
> together?
I could certainly see the benefit of that.
+Thomas
--
Thomas
On 29/11/06, Jegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The MAC address is defined as an unsigned integer in MIB.
Which MIB are you referring to?
The standard way of representing a MAC address is as a
6-octet (binary) string value. See SNMPv2-TC (MacAddress)
or RFC1213-MIB (PhysAddress) for details.
D
On 01/12/06, Venkata Guddeti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems that the hrProcessorLoad does not give anything.
> Has anyone successfully used this variable from the HOST-RESOURCES-MIB MIB.
Please try the new 5.4 release. The agent finally implements
this object in a sensible manner (for the
Dear All
It seems that the hrProcessorLoad does not give anything.
Has anyone successfully used this variable from the HOST-RESOURCES-MIB MIB.
I though that I can use ssCpuIdle, but it is already marked as 'deprecated'.
Your reply is greatly appreciated.
Thank you very much,
Reddy
--
Dear Dave
Thank you very very much
It worked, that was my mistake.
Thank you again
Reddy
Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 27/11/06, Venkata Guddeti wrote:
> Even if I switch the order of variables, the problem is with the 2nd variable.
That sounds like the handler isn't properly
Hi,
We're currently working to extend the snmp_api interface so that it will
be able to deal with large filehandles.
To avoid quadratic behaviour in our extension for the poll interface
(when using TCP connections), I need to use a hash table for integers.
Is there already one implemented in t
Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>On tor, 2006-11-30 at 16:35 -0500, Dana Burns wrote:
>
>
>>If one was to implement the snmp-community-mib, would the following be a
>>reasonable approach?
>>
>>
>
>I do not like it.
>On the other hand it should be noted that I think net-snmp is altogether
>to tangl
