Re: Fault in 64-Bit Net-SNMP v5.3.1

2006-12-02 Thread Kyle Lussier
> I'd try running 5.4 for >=1 week before anything else. Thanks Thomas! We did the upgrade on a test box and are testing. It looks like lots of improvements in 5.4, thanks so much for all the work everyone is doing. Where I can find them, I hope to contribute bug fixes and Q.A.. Kyle -

Re: Fault in 64-Bit Net-SNMP v5.3.1

2006-12-02 Thread Thomas Anders
Kyle Lussier wrote: > It always trips while freeing inside _sess_process_packet and always > occurs after about a week of the process running, although not after a > specific amount of time more isolated than within 2 days of 1 week. It > appears more to occur based on a volume of SNMP traffic, bu

Re: snmp-community-mib impl how

2006-12-02 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On fre, 2006-12-01 at 10:20 -0500, Dana Burns wrote: > Magnus Fromreide wrote: > > >On tor, 2006-11-30 at 16:35 -0500, Dana Burns wrote: > > > >>- define formats for new snmpd.conf directives for each of the > >>implemented transports corrosponding to > >>the nonVolatile com2sec rows, e.g.

Fault in 64-Bit Net-SNMP v5.3.1

2006-12-02 Thread Kyle Lussier
Reference': > : multiple definition of `usm_malloc_usmStateReference' > /tmp/ccTiH0Iv.o(.text+0x0): first defined here > /usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `usm_malloc_usmStateReference' > changed > from 29 in /tmp/ccTiH0Iv.o to 44 in > /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/

Solution to overcome : multiple definitions of

2006-12-02 Thread Lakshmi
Hi, When I am trying to compile the snmpusm.c file in linux device I am facing the following error. Kindly help me out. $ gcc snmpusm.c -o snmpusm -I/home/me_user/net-snmp-5.3.1/include -lnetsnmp -lcrypto -lm /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.2/../../../libnetsnmp.a(snmpusm.o)(.data+0x80): mult