Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> I wasn't aware that we should write the implementations in the common
> subset of C and C++ but if that is the case then I could do so.
>
> All of the reports below are the result of code like
>
> aType* foo = malloc(sizeof(aType));
>
> and that is perfectly valid C, bu
On sön, 2007-01-07 at 20:55 +0100, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Thomas Anders wrote:
> > Thanks for the quick response. Committed.
>
> However, g++ (4.1.0) still doesn't seem to like snmp_service.c too much:
g++?
I wasn't aware that we should write the implementations in the common
subset of C and C++
On 26/12/06, Clement Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I meet a problem of how to debug snmp codes
> the following is my code...
> void
> init_ustScalarSet(void)
> {
>
> DEBUGMSGTL(("ustScalarSet", "Initializing\n"));
>
> REGISTER_MIB("ustScalarSet", ustScalarSet_variables, variable4,
>
On 07/01/07, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Shield wrote:
> > If you try
> > cat /proc/05026/psinfo
> >
> > how much does this report? Everything, or is this truncated too?
>
> None of that, just binary data, I fear. :-)
> Unlike Linux /proc, Solaris /proc is designed for C, n
Dave Shield wrote:
> If you try
> cat /proc/05026/psinfo
>
> how much does this report? Everything, or is this truncated too?
None of that, just binary data, I fear. :-)
Unlike Linux /proc, Solaris /proc is designed for C, not cat.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de
On 27/12/06, Alexi Zuo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since the our target platform may use a different version of net-snmp, I
> wonder if it is legal to chip net-snmp libraries with our product.
>From the FAQ:
---
Can I reuse the code in my commercial application?
The details of the COPYRIGH
On 05/01/07, Venkata Guddeti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Could any one please let me know how can I create two subagent processes.
> a. What configuration changes are needed in the snmpd.conf to add two
> subagents
None.
> (right now I have a line 'master agentx' for one subagent)
No.
Yo
On 04/01/07, Venkata Guddeti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Can I create two subagent processes on the same machine. One for
> processing get/set and the other for sending the traps.
That is likely to be the safest approach.
As explained in README.thread, the agent code is not thread-safe, s
On 07/01/07, Lilach Givaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found one bug with get bulk - in table_array_ext_data.c
Errr where exactly is this file?
I've checked the source tree, and can't immediately spot it.
This code doesn't seem to apply to 'agent/helpers/table_data.c'
Dave
---
On 04/01/07, John Clinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed on Solaris 9 with NetSNMP 5.4 that:
> HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrSWRunParameters is getting truncated and is
> equivalent to the ps -ef output.
> So, my question is, is this way the implementation on Sun was designed
> to work?
The first
Lilach Givaty wrote:
> My name is Lilach, I work in GO Networks as an embedded programmer.
> I found one bug with get bulk - in table_array_ext_data.c, when getting
> a new parameter in get bulk the counter doesn't reset.
> This is a patch for resetting the counter in find_next_row.
Please post to
Thomas Anders wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response. Committed.
However, g++ (4.1.0) still doesn't seem to like snmp_service.c too much:
snmp_service.c: In function 'int netsnmp_register_default_domain(const char*,
const char*)':
snmp_service.c:35: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to
'nets
Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> Index: include/net-snmp/library/snmp_service.h
[...]
> +extern void
> +netsnmp_register_service_handlers(void);
Thanks for the quick response. Committed.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
---
On 07/01/07, Zhang Chuan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In
> "http://net-snmp.sourceforge.net/docs/FAQ.html#
> How_can_I_get_the_agent_to_generate_a_trap__or_inform__",
> I can find there are two ways to determine *when* to generate the trap:
> i):use DisMan Event MIB
>Since there are no MIB
On 04/01/07, Li Gan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I get snmp packet statistics information? Such as "number of bad
> community name received", "number of traps send out", "number of snmp packet
> received" , "number of snmp packet send out" and so on. Are there api in
> source code I can
Dear All
I am really sorry to dump so many emails to you guys.
I was reading the faqs on multi-threading, it says that there can be multiple
agentx agents.
1. Could any one please let me know how can I create two subagent processes.
a. What configuration changes are needed in the snmpd.conf (rig
Dear All
I have not really understood how to do thread safe programming in this case.
I have read the README.thread, but it is not very clear what do I need to do in
which thread. I have main thread sending traps based on messages received from
the other application and the other thread handles S
Dear All
I have been all day today trying to avoid crash in the my snmp sub agent while
sending a trap. As I have explained in my earlier mail, when there are tonnes
of traps ( I do agree that this should not be the case, but this can happen
based on some wroing input data in another process whi
Dear Robert, Dave, Thomas and Other Coders,
I really appreciate the help you all have provided so far.
My repsonse to Mr. Robert Story's email is as follows:
1. I have not tried the subagent running on the 32 bit system.
2. I have read the README.thread and implemented as per the example given
the
Hi
I have a subagent process that holds scalars, tables etc. I'm wondering on how
to restore the data in the subagent after a restart of the subagent process. As
far as I understand, only a master SNMP agent restart leads to an automatic
coldstart trap being sent, but a subagent restart does _
Hi,
My name is Lilach, I work in GO Networks as an embedded programmer.
I found one bug with get bulk - in table_array_ext_data.c, when getting
a new parameter in get bulk the counter doesn't reset.
This is a patch for resetting the counter in find_next_row.
@@ -32,6 +32,15 @@
* snmp.h:#define
On sön, 2007-01-07 at 14:11 +0100, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Net-SNMP 5.4 and later happen to contain
>
> PATCH: 1282566: from magfr to rework transport creation to allow for
> alternative
> interpretations of the address and a more flexible transport registration
> system
>
> which introduced a c
Net-SNMP 5.4 and later happen to contain
PATCH: 1282566: from magfr to rework transport creation to allow for alternative
interpretations of the address and a more flexible transport registration system
which introduced a call to netsnmp_register_service_handlers() in
snmplib/anmp_api.c. Unfortun
23 matches
Mail list logo
