Re: r16343 broke 5.3.x

2007-05-10 Thread Thomas Anders
Thomas Anders wrote: > I think this change broke agent::default_store in 5.3.x. Not too surprisingly, since perl/agent/default_store/default_store.xs is an almost empty file in 5.3.x SVN now. Wes, what went wrong? +Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)

Re: current status of python bindings in the trunk

2007-05-10 Thread Thomas Anders
G. S. Marzot wrote: > looks good in a quick eyeball review...thanks Thomas. Applied to 5.4.x and trunk (r16352). +Thomas - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 expre

r16343 broke 5.3.x

2007-05-10 Thread Thomas Anders
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Revision: 16343 > http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=16343&view=rev > Author: hardaker > Date: 2007-05-07 13:46:58 -0700 (Mon, 07 May 2007) > > Log Message: > --- > update agent::default_store perl module for new defs > > Modified

Re: current status of python bindings in the trunk

2007-05-10 Thread G. S. Marzot
looks good in a quick eyeball review...thanks Thomas. -G Thomas Anders wrote: > Noah Gift wrote: >> It would be super, super, super cool if we could install the python >> bindings >> via "easy_install" from the python cheeseshop without even worrying about >> the underlying net-snmp package. You

Re: Net-SNMP traps being received in another trap receiver.

2007-05-10 Thread Dave Shield
On 10/05/07,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All of the MIBs (so far) that I've downloaded have not had the 'TRAP-TYPE' > (SNMPv1) or 'NOTIFICATION-TYPE (SNMPv2) portions of a 'normal' MIB. Which MIBs have you looked at? The Net-SNMP enterprise-specific traps are defined in the NET-SNMP-AGENT-MIB as

Net-SNMP traps being received in another trap receiver.

2007-05-10 Thread Blane.Robertson
Good morning, all! Please advise me as to where or how I am to parse some events that I am getting with the Net-SNMP OID. All of the MIBs (so far) that I've downloaded have not had the 'TRAP-TYPE' (SNMPv1) or 'NOTIFICATION-TYPE (SNMPv2) portions of a 'normal' MIB. However, I am in great need

Re: a problem about handling snmptrap

2007-05-10 Thread Aluisio Leonelo Victal
HI yaoyu what is the difference between the agent address of SNMPv1 and the ip address where the packet come from, Ok let's explain Agent address - in RFC 1157 (about SNMPv1) It's a field of the SNMPv1 packet (only for SNMPv1) where we can place the ip address of the agent. This field is n

Re: table inside table

2007-05-10 Thread Dave Shield
On 10/05/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Is it possible to define table inside table ( nested table) in MIB? No. This is invalid under SMI. You need to use "shared indexes" and parallel tables. Have a look at the Disk and Partition tables (in the Host Resources MIB) for an example

table inside table

2007-05-10 Thread santhosh.sundarasamy
Hi, Is it possible to define table inside table ( nested table) in MIB? If possible where I can find the syntax? Does mib2c supports nested table code generation? Thanks, Santhosh - This SF.net email is sponsore

Re: FW: regarding creation of subagents using proxy.

2007-05-10 Thread Dave Shield
On 10/05/07, Siva Prakash Reddy G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >There are 3 modems which behaves as subagents, I need > to retrive the values of above mentioned OID's from the 3 modems using > proxy settings. That means, I am trying to get the values of same > OID's from the 3

help

2007-05-10 Thread Umesh Shivaswamy
Hello, I am in need of help. I am trying to use the sample code but my snmp set action funcation is not at all reached. When i do normal snmp set command it reaches all the function it should. But when after registering all the function it does not reach the reserver and action function at all.

RE: FW: regarding creation of subagents using proxy.

2007-05-10 Thread Siva Prakash Reddy G
Hi! Thanks once again for replaying My OIDS are like this 1) 1.3.6.1.4.1.6798.3.1.1.1.1 2) 1.3.6.1.4.1.6798.3.1.1.1.2 3) 1.3.6.1.4.1.67

RE: problem in compiling new mib by the mib2c

2007-05-10 Thread Kobi Vaknin (kvaknin)
Dave Thanks, I've reinstall the all environment from scratch and it did work. I think there is dependencies in the compilation ,meaning if one of the MIB files is problematic he can influence the others. Kobi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beh

Re: current status of python bindings in the trunk

2007-05-10 Thread Dave Shield
On 09/05/07, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just submitted the following patch (from > Debian) which would at least make life easier for packagers: > Would anyone be willing to review it? I'm no Python expert (to put it mildly!), but this patch seems: a) pla

Re: Patches

2007-05-10 Thread Dave Shield
On 10/05/07, Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a couple of patches which I think would be good to add, does > anyone have any comments? The first two look definite shoo-ins, the third seems plausible, though I'd need to examine the context more carefully to be sure. But I would