RE: When there is "no instance" object in a table, snmpgetnext skip the rest of the objects in the table and search forthe next table

Thanks for the patch information, it seems that patch is already added in 5.3.1, but the problem still exists. The following is the "snmpgetnext 10.1 nlmLogEngineID.0.1" GDB back trace: Breakpoint 2, table_helper_handler (handler=0x10063978, reginfo=0x100633d8, reqinfo=0x100dd5f8, re

RE: When there is "no instance" object in a table, snmpgetnext skip the rest of the objects in the table and search for the next table

Dave, I am using 5.3.1, the implementation agent/mibgroup/notification-log-mib is provided in 5.3.1. Since transport is NULL, COLUMN_NLMLOGENGINETADDRESS and COLUMN_NLMLOGENGINETDOMAIN are NULL. However, COLUMN_NLMLOGNOTIFICATIONID is not NULL, but getnext would skip it because of the two NULL obj

Re: Setting fdset for select without snmp_select_info

I already tried that. If I try to access the socket with transport->sock or similar (like snmp_sess_transport(ss)->sock) the application behaves in a very strange way. Basically every line containig transport->sock and all the following code is ignored (as if a return call was placed in their p

Re: SnmpdReconfig

On 06/09/07, alok bharti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am using net-snmp-5.3.1 > > when i try to re-configure snmpd without stoping it, > it throws error. i give SIGHUP to reconfigure. > > follwing are the error logs:- > > error on subcontainer '' insert (-1) [snip] Can you please try with the

SnmpdReconfig

Hi, I am using net-snmp-5.3.1 when i try to re-configure snmpd without stoping it, it throws error. i give SIGHUP to reconfigure. follwing are the error logs:- error on subcontainer '' insert (-1) error on subcontainer '' insert (-1) error on subcontainer '' insert (-1) error on subcontainer ''

Re: When there is "no instance" object in a table, snmpgetnext skip the rest of the objects in the table and search for the next table

On 05/09/07, Emi Yanagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am reporting a bug in snmpgetnext. [snip] > Any idea how to improve snmpgetnext in this case? It's not a bug in snmpgetnext.It's an error in snmpd agent. How have you implemented this particular table? What version of the agent are you

Re: Failed to connect to agentx master agent

Glad I was able to help! Oops, it looks like I responded only to you instead of the list. :-) On 9/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > That was mistakenly written but i actually used, > /usr/local/sbin/snmpd -c /usr/local/share/snmpd.conf -X tcp:localhost:706 > > > But

Re: Sending Traps..

[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy. Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn and offer advice. Thanks. ] On 05/09

RE: When there is "no instance" object in a table, snmpgetnext skip the rest of the objects in the table and search forthe next table

Problem is in "sparse_table_helper_handler" function, -if (request->requestvb->type == ASN_NULL || -request->requestvb->type == SNMP_NOSUCHINSTANCE) { +if (request->requestvb->type == SNMP_NOSUCHINSTANCE) { When ' request->requestvb->type' is ASN_NULL