RE: SIGHUP

2007-11-21 Thread Fong Tsui
Also, if you remove the configuration entry, it doesn't work either. -Original Message- From: Fong Tsui Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 12:12 PM To: Fong Tsui; '[email protected]' Subject: RE: SIGHUP I found that it doesn't work if you add the comments in front of

RE: SIGHUP

2007-11-21 Thread Fong Tsui
I found that it doesn't work if you add the comments in front of the configuration entry. But if you really change the configuration entry, it works fine. -Original Message- From: Fong Tsui Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 12:06 PM To: [email protected] Subject: SIGH

SIGHUP

2007-11-21 Thread Fong Tsui
Hi, everybody, I am trying to use "SIGUP" to re-load the configuration instead of restarting snmpd. It seems some of configuration is reloaded correctly but some of them are not. When I comment out rocommunity entry in snmpd.conf and do "killall -HUP snmpd", I can see log message: snmpd[6458]:

Re: Wrong MIB objects in manpage examples

2007-11-21 Thread Dave Shield
On 21/11/2007, Younger Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Run the command: > Snmpgetnext -v 1 -c > SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB::vacmSecurityModel.0."wes" > SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB::vacmSecurityModel.0.wes: > (Index out of range: 0 (vacmS ecurityModel)) > Get-Next was never sen

RE: Wrong MIB objects in manpage examples

2007-11-21 Thread Younger Wang
Run the command: Snmpgetnext -v 1 -c SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB::vacmSecurityModel.0."wes" SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB::vacmSecurityModel.0.wes: (Index out of range: 0 (vacmS ecurityModel)) Get-Next was never sent out, because it found 0 invalid according to the MIB. BR Younger Wang -Or