> On Fri, 09 May 2008 00:47:48 +0200, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
TA> Taking a step back, the major question is: are we willing to offer
TA> packaging for other Linux distros than RedHat/Fedora?
My view has always been: *we* should support all distributions *someone*
is wil
Hi all, where I set up OID description in source code? I need my own
description of new OID in my new MIB. This is output from my own MIB and
looks disappointing without descriptions:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mibwifi]$ ./walkl
+ snmpwalk -v2c -c clovek localhost:5910
SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.1000.1.1.1 = INTEGE
Dave Shield wrote:
> I'd be inclined to suggest we start by drawing up a provisional
> list of which distributions it's worth considering providing
> packages for.
My initial list of distros that *I* am sort-of-supporting (i.e. provide
packages for via the openSuSE Build Service) is here:
htt
Hi,
Thanks for reply.
It reports that I really have libcrypto.a. Why it still asks for
libcrypto.so.0.9.7 when I use --disable-shared in my configure phase?
In your description, it should link static libraries(libcrypto.a) when I
configure with --disable-shared.
Or I need to do other thing to
2008/5/9 Tewen Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have tried --disable-shared in my configure phase.
>
>./configure --disable-shared --target=mips-linux
> --with-cc=mips2_fp_be-gcc --host=mips --with-endianness=big
> --prefix=/not/usr/ --with-install-prefix=/tmp
>
>
>
> But it still sho
Hi,
Thanks for reply.
I have tried --disable-shared in my configure phase.
./configure --disable-shared --target=mips-linux
--with-cc=mips2_fp_be-gcc --host=mips --with-endianness=big --prefix=/not/usr/
--with-install-prefix=/tmp
But it still shows "./snmpd: error while loadi
Hi,
I tried to cross compile net-snmp-5.1.1, but I failed.
My steps were as following:
step 1: ./configure --target=mips-linux --with-cc=mips2_fp_be-gcc --host=mips
--with-endianness=big --prefix=/not/usr/ --with-install-prefix=/tmp
step 2: make
step 3: make install
step 4: cd /tmp
step 5: ta
2008/5/8 Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Taking a step back, the major question is: are we willing to offer
> packaging for other Linux distros than RedHat/Fedora?
Ideally, yes.
I'd be inclined to suggest we start by drawing up a provisional
list of which distributions it's worth considering