Agentx communication issues with net-snmp 5.4.1

Hi, I was using net-snmp 5.1.4 earlier and we have a subagent communicating using agentx with our master agent. Things were working fine. We are now trying to upgrade to net-snmp 5.4.1 and the master agent and the subagent are not communicating. The subagent seems to register the MIBS fine, I ca

Re: default timeout

> On Mon, 12 May 2008 07:35:53 -0700 (PDT), tak oishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: to> What is the default timeout value for this version? I think it's a second. to> How can I modify this value? I downloaded this, but to> couldn't find parameter... It's a parameter in the session struct

Re: about net-snmp-5.1.1

> On Mon, 12 May 2008 14:00:07 +0800, "Tewen Hsieh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: TH> But when I use "snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost system", it only TH> shows "End of MIB". What does it mean? It means you don't have access control to anything in the agent :-) TH> What's the difference

Re: Urgent - Unknown User Name

> On Tue, 13 May 2008 14:24:46 +0530, "Pachiappan D" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: PD> I have written an API to add a snmpv3 user.( Like net-snmp-config ) PD> Before starting the agent,my API appends the two lines in appropriate PD> files as below, Did you write the file when the agent was

Re: Asynchronous write

> On Wed, 14 May 2008 15:03:37 +0200, Jan Safranek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: JS> net-snmp by default expects that send() on a socket always send whole JS> provided buffer and is blocking. This leads to deadlocks under heavy JS> load - see bug #1598344. Interesting findings and good work! M

Re: Asynchronous write

On ons, 2008-05-14 at 15:03 +0200, Jan Safranek wrote: > Hi, > > net-snmp by default expects that send() on a socket always send whole > provided buffer and is blocking. This leads to deadlocks under heavy > load - see bug #1598344. > > I'm rewriting the snmp_api so the write will be asynchrono

Re: about ./configure options

On ons, 2008-05-14 at 15:52 +0800, Tewen Hsieh wrote: > Hi, > > What is the difference between "--disable-shared" and > "--with-ldflags=-Bstatic" in configure phase? --disable-shared tells configure that you don't want to build any shared libraries. -Bstatic tells the linker that you don't wish

Re: dlmod error

On ons, 2008-05-14 at 21:28 +0800, Tewen Hsieh wrote: > > But when I loaded wpWlsCore.so and wpWlsBridge.so, I got following > error message: > > /not/usr/sbin> ./snmpd -f -L -DwpWlsCore,dlmod > dlmod: register mib > dlmod: dlmod_path: /not/usr//lib/snmp/dlmod > dlmod: dlmod_create_module

dlmod error

Hi, Thanks for reply. I describe my work again. I cross compiled net-snmp-5.1.1 successfully. My cross compile procedure: step 1: ./configure --target=mips-linux --with-cc=mips2_fp_be-gcc --host=mips --with-endianness=big --prefix=/not/usr/ --with-install-prefix=/tmp step 2: make step 3: mak

about ./configure options

Hi, What is the difference between "--disable-shared" and "--with-ldflags=-Bstatic" in configure phase? I tried these two options, but it still asked me to install libcrypto.so.0.9.7. Even I used these two options at the same time, it still asked for libcrypto.so.0.9.7. I am really confused. In

net-snmp-5.1.1

Hi, I installed net-snmp-5.1.1 successfully. But I always got a "no such object"response no matter waht get request(ex: get sysDescr) I sent to snmpd. Is this a bug of net-snmp-5.1.1? Or I missed something? Thanks. I havied tried other versions (5.3.2), there is no this error. iTAS Tewen 永鈦鑫

Re: place where agent holds data of SNMPv3 users

[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > Hi! Could you please help me with location of SNMPv3 users data > (securityName, authKey, selected auth and priv protocols and so on. I know > about usmUserTable. Where does this table get data from? snmpd.conf in the persistent directory (see output of "net-snmp-confi

place where agent holds data of SNMPv3 users

Hi! Could you please help me with location of SNMPv3 users data (securityName, authKey, selected auth and priv protocols and so on. I know about usmUserTable. Where does this table get data from? Thanks in advance. - This SF

Re: r16909 broke RH7.1 build for all branches

Dave Shield wrote: > #ifndef SIOCGMIIPHY > #define SIOCGMIIPHY 0x > #endif > > (and similarly for SIOCGMIIREG) I agree. Applied in r16944. +Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de) - This SF.net em

Asynchronous write

Hi, net-snmp by default expects that send() on a socket always send whole provided buffer and is blocking. This leads to deadlocks under heavy load - see bug #1598344. I'm rewriting the snmp_api so the write will be asynchronous and non-blocking. It seems to me that the session API is somehow