On fre, 2008-05-16 at 14:01 +0800, Tewen Hsieh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for reply.
>
> > Coud you please includ the output of ldd on both the agent and the .so.
>
> /not/usr/sbin> ls
> snmpd snmptrapd
> /not/usr/sbin> ldd ./snmpd
Ok. This looks reasonable.
> > I'd guess that there is some
2008/5/18 Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The interesting thing from my point of view is that scalar registers
> and answers with the value for .0 and with NO_SUCH_OBJECT
> otherwise
Does it? I must check and fix that.
It ought to return noSuchInstance for . requests.
> whereas sca
On lör, 2008-05-17 at 13:14 +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> 2008/5/11 Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I stupidly trusted the helpers to do the right thing and tried to
> > register
> >
> > snmp.[1-6].0
> > snmp.[8-22].0
> > snmp.[24-29].0
> > snmp.30.0
> >
> > as scalar_groups (and a scalar)
Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389631
AFAICS that bugreport (against net-snmp) is closed with resolution
NOTABUG and the last entry is from Bernard Johnson saying that he'll try
fixing the bug on his side.
+Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
I am new to fedora packaging and thought of taking this all important
ntop packaging :) After going through the efforts already put in by
Bernard Johnson[1]. I found that a closed bug[2] needs to be reopened as
net-snmp-5.4.1-6.fc8 is still
