So this is a point I've never been clear on:
Say I've got a table, and I've just gotten a GETNEXT request for the OID
of one of the column heads. Should I return the OID for the next column
head or the OID of the first field of that column?
On a similar note, I've been looking at pass and pass
2009/1/21 Dave Shield :
> The best way to do this would be to tie it in with the (existing)
> NET-SNMP-AGENT-MIB::nsCacheTable.This includes a column
> object nsCacheTimeout which is intended to control exactly this
> behaviour. This MIB is already linked in with the cache handler
> helper, s
2009/1/21 Daniel Montero Motilla :
> I'm working on a patch to allow modifying the update frequency value
> for network interface traffic data on IF-MIB, as by now it is
> established from IFTABLE_CACHE_TIMEOUT constant.
> Do you think that is the better approach to accomplish this task or is
> th
Hello,
I'm working on a patch to allow modifying the update frequency value
for network interface traffic data on IF-MIB, as by now it is
established from IFTABLE_CACHE_TIMEOUT constant.
I've registered a config handler using 'snmpd_register_config_handler'
to parse a new 'ifTableCacheTimeout' to
2009/1/20 Wes Hardaker :
>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:58:41 +0100, Magnus Fromreide
>> said:
>
> MF> I just wanted to know if it would be permissible to remove the varargs.h
> MF> support from the code base?
>
> Well, I've actually been wondering about that section of code as well.
> It stem
2009/1/21 satyam :
> what is the best way to handle group of similar scalars ?
> I was looking at scalar_group and it seems to meet requirement perfectly
>
> Would it take care of getnext processing and getbulk processing ?
Yes
Dave
-
