Re: SNMPGET error

2009-02-05 Thread Robert Story
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:53:16 +0530 Santhosh IN BLR SISL wrote: KSIBS> After successful build I started the AGENT and issued the command KSIBS> snmpget.Instead of getting the value, am getting the following error KSIBS> KSIBS> Error in packet KSIBS> KSIBS> Reason: (noSuchName) There is no such var

Re: Modifying IFTABLE_CACHE_TIMEOUT via snmpd.conf (WIP)

2009-02-05 Thread Robert Story
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:25 +0100 Daniel wrote: DMM> 2009/1/21 Dave Shield : DMM> > The best way to do this would be to tie it in with the (existing) DMM> > NET-SNMP-AGENT-MIB::nsCacheTable.This includes a column DMM> > object nsCacheTimeout which is intended to control exactly this DMM> > beh

Re: On copy_nword

2009-02-05 Thread Robert Story
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:00:57 +0100 Magnus wrote: MF> I have made some characterizing tests of copy_nword in order to change MF> it and what I have found is the following: MF> MF> * The return value is NULL on error OR on last argument so it is MF> impossible to distinguish those case

Re: Help on SNMP Tables

2009-02-05 Thread Robert Story
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:59:12 - Baltazar wrote: BF> I want to know if it is possible to dynamically adicionate rows to a "basic" table (without row-status column). BF> If yes, how can I do it ? BF> If no, why is it not possible ? Yes and no.. It depends on the table. Some tables will create a

Re: snmpset and non-root user

2009-02-05 Thread Robert Story
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:13:50 +0530 Pranesh wrote: PK> I am running my agent as the subagent under the root user. If I am PK> login as normal user , and do the snmpset operation , it is allowing to set PK> the parameter.But my requirement says , it should only set the parameter if PK> it is root

Re: net-snmp 5.3.3.pre1 available

2009-02-05 Thread Robert Story
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:07:42 -0800 Larry wrote: LD> There is something wrong either with your summary or with some emailer - I LD> get partial lines like "- Corrected registering of" and "- Applying patch LD> from Magnus Fromreide to fix the". It's actually a problem with the script that generated

Re: Variable binding ordering

2009-02-05 Thread Dave Shield
2009/2/5 Lab Partner : > I notice there's no requirement to uphold the ordering of variable > bindings within a request, That's not strictly true. The varbinds in a response must match the order of the varbinds in the original request. (see RFC 1905, e.g. the second paragraph of section 4.2.1)

Re: net-snmp 5.3.3.pre1 available

2009-02-05 Thread Larry Dickson
There is something wrong either with your summary or with some emailer - I get partial lines like "- Corrected registering of" and "- Applying patch from Magnus Fromreide to fix the". Larry Dickson Cutting Edge Networked Storage On 2/4/09, Robert Story wrote: > > This is a summary of the major c

Variable binding ordering

2009-02-05 Thread Lab Partner
I notice there's no requirement to uphold the ordering of variable bindings within a request, but is there a requirement to specifically ignore order? Since that was probably ambiguous, here's the example: I have a table extension to an existing table and unfortunatelty an object needs to be set i