Hi All,
In net-snmp configure options --cflags = -Os . ( reduces the size
in linux ( fedora 7) )
is this good to have this optimization flags ? .. is there is any drawbacks of
this ..?
Thanks
Amit
--
O
Hi David,
One of my original problem was that when using snmpwalk command on say a
column (without any instance index) of one of the tables,
my subagent handler was getting called
once with getnext and next with get mode. I wasn't sure if that
was the expected sequence of calls.
I was not seeing
All,
I have made the changes suggested below and the getnext functionality works as
expected. I see the proper index values when I fetch the table. Changing the
index type as suggested in netsnmp_table_helper_and_indexes() did the trick.
(test_handler.c)
The index values without byte length
Hi All ,
I am using net-snmp-5.4.2.1 tarball .. i am getting the following
errors messages
file included from module_tmp_header.h:78:
./agent/mibgroup/private/globalOID.h:1:38: error: net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h:
No such file or directory
In file included from ./agent/mibgroup/private/g
2009/2/27 GK Reddy Chinthalapudi :
> I installed NET-SNMP. I written my own MIB and I able to set and get the
> values in my MIB. My problem is where this setting and getting is actually
> happening in net-snmp source code.
It is handled in the appropriate "MIB implementation module".
I.e. the cod
Hi,
This is G K Reddy, my doubt is regarding SNMP agent programming. I am new to
this snmp programming.
I installed NET-SNMP. I written my own MIB and I able to set and get the
values in my MIB. My problem is where this setting and getting is actually
happening in net-snmp source code. Because my
