Re: crash in snmplib/snmpusm.c

2009-09-11 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:32:31 +0530, sanjaykumar > said: s> 1. Does [ user nanoName[] = "" ] is valid user name ? It is when doing engineID probes, an empty string is legal. I can't remember off the top of my head whether that particular function needs to support a empty strin

Re: IPV6 related query

2009-09-11 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:00:26 +0530, Deepali Singalkar > said: DS> Further when I issue the snmpget command with ipv6 address as specified in DS> the response to FAQ_Application 28 DS> snmpget -v 3 -n '' -l authPriv -u myuser -A my_password 'udp6:[::1]:161' -l DS> authNoPriv sysUpTime.0

Re: Net-SNMP ported to VxWorks 5.5.1

2009-09-11 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:24:06 -0600, "Lewis, Dennis B" > said: DBL> By now I assume that Net-SNMP has been ported to VxWorks - at least the DBL> Net-SNMP configure script recognizes -host=ppc-wrs. DBL> Can anyone point me in the direction of a working VxWorks port? Generally we know p

Re: How to configure netsnmp to handle both ipv4 and ipv6 requests?

2009-09-11 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:06:33 -0700, Lew Glendenning > said: LG> I have enabled udp6 transport in the configuration, and the LG> resulting snmpd indeed handles requests via the ipv6 address. LG> The socket/bind calls that handle udp6: apparently use in6addr_any, LG> so I would expect th