Re: Need clarification regarding Mac Address as Index

2010-02-08 Thread Sasikumar
Hi Dave, Thank you for the providing the solution. It was registered as ASN_OCTET_STR when code was generated using mib2c. It works properly with ASN_PRIV_IMPLIED_OCTET_STR Regards, Sasikumar.B --- On Mon, 8/2/10, Dave Shield wrote: > From: Dave Shield > Subject: Re: Need clarification re

Re: How to Discover Engine-ID of a notify receiver( by SNMP Agent at run-time) in net-snmp

2010-02-08 Thread Dave Shield
On 8 February 2010 11:42, Hemanth Raju wrote: >               does the snmp agent store this engine-ID > for future informs It should do - yes. Dave -- The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colo

Re: How to Discover Engine-ID of a notify receiver( by SNMP Agent at run-time) in net-snmp

2010-02-08 Thread Hemanth Raju
Thanks Dave, I agree with u, now does the snmp agent store this engine-ID for future informs or every time it will discover to send inform. I want to avoid re-discover for every inform, am trying to simulate this, if u already know kindly help me. thanks & regards, hemanth

Re: Need clarification regarding Mac Address as Index

2010-02-08 Thread Dave Shield
On 8 February 2010 05:00, Sasikumar wrote: >    I am implementing Q-BRIDGE-MIB in this table is dot1qTpFdbTable > which as dot1qTpFdbAddress as one of the Index. > My question is when this table was queried the output contains > length of the Mac address, Is this valid. No. You are quite correct.