> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:27:21 -0700 (PDT), surya prakash
> said:
sp> This causes the client (snmpclient) to resend the packet (with one
sp> varbind less) and which in turn cause 'no such instance object' for
sp> the next 20 set of SNMPget packet request.
This is a very common situation
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:18:29 -0500, Nadia Bibbs said:
NB> Reason: (genError) A general failure occured Failed Object:
NB> NET-SNMP-TUTORIAL-MIB::nstAgentSubagentObject.0
NB> I do not see any error messges on the agent or subagent side to show
NB> that there is an error on their ends.
It l
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:08:44 -0600, said:
jw> It can NOT be found on the sourceforge page. I had to go to a network
jw> administrator to get the package.
Most distributions may change which files are packaged in which names.
Or even change the names of the packages themselves. It's a co
> On Mon, 03 May 2010 15:41:42 +0900 (KST), "»ý°¢Çϱâ"
> said:
b> 6. But when I make net-snmp, no error arised even though no library
b> linked
You'd have to look at the output to be sure that your code was getting
compiled... Does it work after you intsall and run it? Something seem
> On Sun, 2 May 2010 23:44:38 -0400, Robert Story
> said:
RS> I'd like to move the configure prompts for values earlier in the configure
RS> process.
Well, there was a reason way-back-when. But since I don't remember it I
think you're good to go :-)
[When the prompts were originally w
> On Mon, 03 May 2010 09:29:27 +0200, Magnus Fromreide
> said:
MF> From my point of view we could just remove the prompt stuff and make the
MF> command line options mandatory.
They were put in because the people that don't use the command line
options are the ones that most likely need
> On Wed, 5 May 2010 07:13:02 -0700, Steve Friedl said:
SF> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:34:22AM -0400, Michael A Wagner wrote:
>> Are there any license terms associated with this software?
>>
>> If so, please tell me where to find them or send me a copy of the license
>> agreement.
SF> The
A nice detailed leak report. Coders, can you please investigate?
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Mark Brooks [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 6:33 AM
To: Mike Ayers
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Memory Leaking w
We may have fixed it, by applying the patch
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2871747&group_id=12694&atid=312694
ill let you know how it goes
Mark
On 6 May 2010 16:30, Mike Ayers wrote:
>
>A nice detailed leak report. Coders, can you please investigate?
>
>
>
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Robert Story wrote:
> On Thu, 6 May 2010 08:15:58 +0100 Dave wrote:
> DS> > Essentially I am seeing the below command succeeds for any community
> name.
> DS> > Please suggest, if i am missing something.
> DS> > snmpwalk -v 1 -c whatever IP
> DS>
> DS> It's impossi
On Thu, 6 May 2010 08:15:58 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> > Essentially I am seeing the below command succeeds for any community name.
DS> > Please suggest, if i am missing something.
DS> > snmpwalk -v 1 -c whatever IP
DS>
DS> It's impossible to tell what might be happening from a single (incomplete)
DS>
On 6 May 2010 03:41, Sudarshan Soma wrote:
> Can you also let me know why the
> community name change doesn't work for ucd-snmp-4.2 version.
Configuration of access control should work in exactly the same way
for the UCD 4.x agent, as it does for later Net-SNMP 5.x releases.
> Essentially I am
12 matches
Mail list logo
