This is an auto-replied message. I am out of office right now. I will be back
in the office 26 July 2010.
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/f
Steve DeLaney wrote:
> so I made a patch to agent/mibgroup/agent/extend.c and would like to
> submit it for consideration to include in 5.6
Thanks for the patch! Please submit it to http://www.net-snmp.org/patches so it
won't get lost.
+Thomas
--
Thanks. But are you suggesting that I change the longs to int32_t
throughout the baseline net-snmp code, the very exercise that the good
folks at net-snmp thought was too onerous to take on? I'm hesitant to
change that so far untouched code, although I did look into that very
possibility. Probl
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:36:26 +0100 Angela wrote:
AP> I have now managed to implement my table using MfD. It works fine and
AP> I'm really pleased with it. In the beginning I was a bit daunted by
AP> the MfD, but turns out it is really simple - hence the name I guess
AP> :-)
Yay! :-)
AP> I also di
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:03:00 -0400 John wrote:
JG> But later, deep in the net-snmp code, at the top of the routine
JG> asn_build_int(), we fail this sanity test:
JG>
JG> if (intsize != sizeof(long)) {
JG> _asn_size_err(errpre, intsize, sizeof(long));
JG> return NULL;
JG>
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:34:31 +0200 Pierluigi wrote:
P> how do I know which is the maximum number of snmp sessions i can open on
P> my system.
It's probably limited by the number of sockets a process can have open, which
is an OS limit.
I'm new to net-snmp and apologize in advance if this topic is already
covered.
But, running some recent tests I ran into this issue
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg08476.html
and this aspect is present in 5.5 and 5.6.pre2
what we are after for our applicat
For historic reasons, the project we are working on is stuck using a
very old version of net-snmp (5.1.2). However, looking at the more
recent code, it looks like the problem I am seeing exists there too.
We recently made the transition from 32 bits to 64 bits, and I find that
under 64 bits, I
Robert Story wrote:
> It is a bug, and I saw that Wes just got through checking in a fix.
Thanks for
> prodding us. :-)
Okay. Had a quick look at the patches and couldn't see anything. What's
the best way of picking up the official fix?
Adam.
-
